INVO Fertility shares surge 163.44% after-hours on strong post-market trading volume.

think> Okay, let's see. The user provided a stock performance for INVO Fertility that jumped 163.44% in after-hours trading. The task is to link this movement to the relevant news. Looking at the recent news events, there's a specific mention of INVO Fertility (IVF.US) in the after-hours report. The summary says it surged 156.03% with a price of $2.08 and high trading volume. The content reiterates that. The other stocks like NewGenIVF and Titan Mining also had big moves, but the user is focusing on INVO Fertility here. The instructions say to check if the news events are relevant. The first news event directly mentions INVO Fertility with the percentage increase and details. Since the stock's movement is in the after-hours session and the news is about after-hours trading, it's a direct match. The key here is that the news is reporting the after-hours surge, which is the same period as the stock's performance. The reason for the jump isn't explicitly stated in the provided news, but the news itself is confirming the after-hours activity. Since the user's example just states the news event as the cause without needing to infer beyond the given info, I can use the provided summary as the cause. I need to round the percentage to two decimals, which would be 163.44%. Wait, the input says 163.44165436%, so rounding to two decimals is 163.44%. But the example output used two decimal places, so I should follow that. However, the provided news says 156.03%, but the actual stock performance is higher. Wait, maybe there's a discrepancy here. The user input says the stock moved up 163.44%, but the news mentions 156.03%. But since the example uses the exact number from the news, maybe I should use the 156.03% as per the news. But the user's input says the stock's performance is 163.44%... Hmm, perhaps the user made a mistake, but the task is to follow the input. Wait, the input says the stock's performance is after-hour up 163.44%, but the news says "现涨156.03%". So the news is a report of the after-hours movement. Therefore, the key is that the after-hours report is the cause. The movement is due to the after-hours trading activity reported in the news. So the explanation would be that INVO Fertility surged in after-hours trading as reported, with the news highlighting the surge. The exact percentage in the output should be 163.44% as per the input, rounded to two decimals. But the news mentions 156.03%. Wait, maybe there's a typo. But the user's input says the stock's performance is up 163.44%, which is different from the news. However, the news is part of the input, so maybe the user wants to use the news's figure. But the example uses the stock's performance percentage. Wait, the example input had Pineapple Energy Inc.大涨4.230769% and the output used 4.23%. So the output uses the rounded percentage from the input. Therefore, in this case, the output should use 163.44% (rounded from 163.44165436). The news mentions 156.03%, which is a bit lower, but the user's instruction is to use the stock's movement data. However, the news is the source of the cause. Maybe the user expects to use the news's figure. But the example uses the input's percentage. Hmm. Let me check again. The example input had a stock performance of 4.230769% and the output used 4.23%. So the output uses the rounded version of the input. Therefore, here, the input is 163.44165436%, which rounds to 163.44%. The news says the stock is up 156.03% in the after-hours. But the user's input says the stock's movement is up 163.44%. This discrepancy might be a mistake, but since the user provided both, I need to follow the input. However, the news is part of the input's recent events. The key is that the news is the cause. So the output should state that the stock surged 163.44% in after-hours trading, and the key news is the after-hours report. Therefore, the explanation is that the after-hours report highlighted the surge.