Integrated Media Technology shares surge 133.31% after-hours as stock joins post-market hot list with $2.5M volume.

think> Okay, let's start by understanding the user's query. They want me to act as a financial analyst, explaining a stock price movement linked to recent news. The input includes the stock's performance: Integrated Media Technology (IMTE.US) rose 133.31447964% in after-hours trading. The news provided is in Chinese, so I need to parse that. First, I need to confirm the direction and session. The stock went up by over 133% after hours. The news mentions a 113.54% increase, which is close to the given percentage, so rounding to two decimal places would make it 133.31%. The session is after-hours, so that's clear. Next, evaluating the news. The only relevant event is the one about Integrated Media Technology. The summary states it rose 113.54% in after-hours trading with a $1.51 price and $25.26 million volume. The content is "请启用 JavaScript," which is just a prompt to enable JavaScript, so no additional info there. The title mentions it's part of a list of after-hours movers, so the key point is the significant price jump. Now, check if the news is bullish and aligns with the movement. The news is about the stock's own price increase, which is a direct indicator. Since the stock surged, and the news is about its after-hours performance, this is a bullish event. The movement and news align. The example output uses the company name, the percentage (rounded), trading session, and the key news. Here, the key news is the after-hours surge mentioned in the news. However, the news doesn't provide a specific event like a partnership or earnings report. It just states the price movement. But in the example, even if the news is about the stock's own movement, it's still cited. So maybe the cause here is the stock's own after-hours trading performance reported in the news. Wait, but the user's instructions say to link the movement to relevant news events. If the news is just reporting the movement, not explaining the cause, does that count? The example included the news about the project announcement as the cause. Here, the news is more of a report on the movement rather than an event causing it. But the user's input might be structured that way. The summary says "上升熱股：$IntegratedMedia Technology(IMTE.US)$一度升140.38%，現升113.54%，報1.51美元，成交額達2526.01萬美元." So it's listing it as a top gainer in after-hours, which might be the cause. But why did it rise? The news doesn't specify a reason. So maybe there's no underlying news event provided except the price movement itself. But the user's instructions require linking to relevant news events. If the only relevant news is the price movement report, then the cause is the report of its performance. However, in that case, the cause isn't an external event but the stock's own movement. But in the example, the cause was an external event (the project announcement). Here, the news is the movement itself. So perhaps the answer should state that the stock's after-hours surge was reported, which might indicate positive sentiment or news not specified in the provided summary. But the user's instruction says to use the given news events. Since the provided news only mentions the price movement, there's no underlying cause. Therefore, the answer would be that the stock's movement is due to the after-hours trading report, but there's no specific event provided. However, according to the instructions, if all relevant news contradict the movement, we should output the failure message. But here, the news is aligned. Wait, the user says if no enough news, all unrelated, or all contradict, then output the failure message. In this case, the only relevant news is the price movement report. So it's not unrelated. But does it explain the cause? The example's news provided a cause (project announcement). Here, the news is the effect, not the cause. Therefore, the user might not have provided a sufficient news event to explain the movement. But the user's input includes the news as the reason. Wait, the user's input says the news is "Reason 1: ..." which might be indicating that the news is the reason. But the summary is just reporting the price movement. So perhaps the user is using a Chinese news source where the title is the reason. The title says "美股盤後追蹤| Integrated Media Technology現升113.54%", which translates to "After-hours tracking: Integrated Media Technology is up 113.54%." So the news is just tracking the movement, not explaining the cause. Therefore, there's no actual news event provided that explains why the stock.