El cambio en la regulación de las criptomonedas en la India: Cargas legales y madurez del mercado

Generado por agente de IAAnders MiroRevisado porAInvest News Editorial Team
lunes, 12 de enero de 2026, 3:43 am ET2 min de lectura

India's cryptocurrency market is undergoing a seismic regulatory transformation in 2025, driven by the Financial Intelligence Unit's (FIU) stringent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) norms. These measures, while aimed at curbing illicit activity and aligning with global standards, have introduced significant compliance burdens for virtual digital asset (VDA) service providers. For investors, the implications are twofold: a more mature, transparent market and a landscape where operational costs and regulatory complexity could reshape competitive dynamics.

Compliance Burdens: A New Era of Verification

The FIU's 2025 guidelines mandate

, including live selfie checks with liveness detection to prevent deepfake impersonation. Exchanges must also during account creation, while bank account verification now requires a Re 1 "penny-drop" transaction to confirm ownership . These measures, coupled with mandatory submission of Permanent Account Numbers (PANs) and secondary government-issued IDs (e.g., Aadhaar, passports), have .

For platforms, the cost of compliance is rising. Smaller exchanges, in particular, face challenges in

. Enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk clients-such as politically exposed persons (PEPs) or users from FATF grey-listed jurisdictions-adds . While these steps are , they risk pricing out smaller players, potentially leading to .

Market Maturity: Trust vs. Friction

Despite the regulatory hurdles, India's crypto ecosystem is showing signs of maturation.

in 2025, reflecting a shift from speculative trading to strategic allocations. The FIU's and the from April 2027 signal a commitment to global alignment.

However, the high friction of India's tax regime-30% on crypto gains, 1% tax deducted at source (TDS), and no loss offsets-acts as a

. This contrasts with more comprehensive licensing regimes in the EU's MiCA or Singapore's MAS, which . While the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is , the absence of clear regulations for stablecoins and tokenized securities remains .

Investment Implications: Costs, Competitiveness, and Offshore Shifts

The regulatory push has introduced a dichotomy for investors. On one hand, stricter norms enhance trust and accountability, attracting institutional capital. On the other, compliance costs and user onboarding complexities may deter casual participation and

.

For crypto platforms, the cost of compliance is a critical factor. Startups and mid-sized exchanges face resource constraints in deploying AML technologies, potentially

. Meanwhile, global capital flows are being influenced by India's alignment with FATF standards, though the lack of a unified regulatory framework-spanning taxation, AML, and securities law-remains .

Future Outlook: Balancing Innovation and Oversight

India's regulatory trajectory suggests a focus on structured, compliance-first platforms. The FIU's

and the RBI's over stablecoins indicate a long-term strategy to centralize control. However, the challenge lies in balancing innovation with oversight. As the government works toward a comprehensive framework-potentially through the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill-the market's ability to adapt will determine .

For now, India's crypto market is at a crossroads. While the regulatory burden is undeniable, the path to a mature, transparent ecosystem is being paved-one selfie, one geolocation, and one compliance checkpoint at a time.

author avatar
Anders Miro

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios