ICE's $400M Volume Ranks 244th as Stock Slides Amid Regulatory Scrutiny and Market Volatility

On September 12, 2025, , ranking 244th in market activity. , reflecting modest pressure amid broader market dynamics.

Recent developments highlight regulatory scrutiny over the company’s energy trading practices, with reports indicating ongoing investigations by U.S. authorities. While no direct penalties have been imposed, the uncertainty has dampened investor sentiment. Analysts note that the stock’s performance remains sensitive to macroeconomic shifts, particularly in commodities markets where ICE holds significant exposure.

Technical indicators suggest short-term volatility may persist as the stock tests key support levels. However, long-term fundamentals remain stable, with the company’s and recent cost-cutting initiatives providing a buffer against sector-specific risks. Market participants are closely monitoring upcoming earnings reports for further clarity on operational resilience.

I can certainly help design and back-test this idea, but first I need to confirm a few practical details so that the test is both feasible and informative: 1. Universe definition • “All stocks” can mean thousands of tickers. • Would you like to limit the universe to a standard set (e.g., current S&P 1500 constituents, Russell 3000, or another list you have in mind)? 2. Re-balancing mechanics • Should we buy at the close of each day and sell at the next day’s close (close-to-close), or use open prices? • Equal-weight (i.e., 1/500th in each name) or volume-weighted / capital-weighted? 3. Transaction costs & slippage • Should we assume zero frictions, or add a commission and/or bid-ask slippage? 4. Benchmark (optional) • Any specific benchmark you’d like the results compared with (e.g., SPY)? Let me know your preferences (or if you’d like default assumptions). Once clarified, I’ll retrieve the necessary data and run the back-test.