Dinámica del suministro de tokens de Hyperliquid y sus implicaciones de mercado: ¿pueden las liberaciones y las recompresas predecibles estabilizar HYPE en un entorno de DeFi competitivo?

The DeFi ecosystem in 2025 is marked by a growing emphasis on tokenomics as a tool for price stability. Among the most scrutinized projects is Hyperliquid, whose native token, HYPE, faces a critical juncture with its first major cliff unlock on November 29, 2025. This event, releasing 9.92 million tokens to core contributors, marks the beginning of a 24-month linear vesting schedule for 23.8% of the total supply. The question now is whether Hyperliquid's aggressive buyback mechanisms-allocating 97% of protocol fees to repurchase HYPE-can counteract the selling pressure from these unlocks and maintain price stability in a crowded DeFi market.

Token Supply Dynamics: A Double-Edged Sword

Hyperliquid's token supply is fixed at 1 billion HYPE, with 271 million (27.1%) currently in circulation. The November 2025 unlock introduces a structural challenge: core contributor tokens will be released in monthly tranches of ~9.9 million, equivalent to 3.6% of the circulating supply. At current prices, this represents $380–470 million in monthly liquidity pressure. While the Assistance Fund has accumulated 29.8 million HYPE tokens (valued at $1.5 billion) for buybacks, its capacity to absorb these unlocks is limited. Analysts estimate a $280–380 million monthly gap between unlock volume and buyback capacity, creating a net inflationary effect.

This dynamic contrasts with projects like Uniswap, which employs a fee-to-burn model under its UNIfication proposal. By redirecting 0.05% of trading fees to a shared treasury, Uniswap aims to create a deflationary feedback loop, with annualized burns projected at $460 million. Hyperliquid's approach, however, is more aggressive: its buyback engine has already spent $644.64 million to repurchase 21.36 million HYPE tokens by October 2025, achieving an annualized buyback rate of $1.15 billion-nearly triple Uniswap's projected burn. Yet, this intensity comes with risks. The Assistance Fund's centralized control and lack of transparency have drawn criticism, with skeptics questioning whether algorithmic execution can outpace market sentiment during volatile periods.

Comparative Analysis: Buybacks in a Crowded Field

Hyperliquid's buyback strategy is part of a broader trend in DeFi, where projects like dYdX and Pump.fun have adopted similar mechanisms. dYdX, for instance, allocates 75% of protocol fees to repurchase DYDX tokens, while Pump.fun uses 100% of its revenue for burns according to industry reports. However, Hyperliquid's model stands out for its scale and automation. During the October 2025 crypto crash, its buyback infrastructure proved resilient, absorbing $25 million in weekly liquidity without significant slippage. This contrasts with Pump.fun's $205 million buyback in December 2025, which temporarily boosted PUMP's price to $0.0068 but failed to address long-term utility concerns.

The key differentiator lies in Hyperliquid's closed-source L1 chain (HyperCore) and its ability to scale buybacks with market conditions. Unlike Uniswap's DAO-driven governance, which prioritizes adaptability over speed, Hyperliquid's system operates with minimal human intervention. This efficiency has allowed it to maintain a market cap more than double that of Uniswap as of November 2025. Yet, the absence of a public roadmap for managing the 2025–2027 unlock schedule has fueled investor skepticism. Prominent figures like Arthur Hayes have already sold HYPE holdings, signaling caution about potential price corrections.

Historical Volatility and Market Reactions

Price data from late 2025 underscores the challenges Hyperliquid faces. Following the November 29 unlock, HYPE's price plummeted 60% from its all-time high of $57.38 to $22.4, testing critical support levels. The market's reaction to the Hyper Foundation's proposed burn of 37 million HYPE tokens ($1 billion) was mixed, with the token sliding 9% post-announcement as traders questioned the move's efficacy. Technical analyses highlight a head-and-shoulders pattern, projecting further declines toward $20 if the $25 support level breaks.

Despite these headwinds, Hyperliquid's dominance in the perpetual DEX space-holding a 39.6% market share as of November 30, 2025-suggests underlying demand. Daily trading fees of $2.2 million provide a steady revenue stream for buybacks, though analysts argue this is insufficient to offset the $270 million monthly unlock value. One report notes, "Without inherent governance rights" or profit-sharing mechanisms, HYPE's value proposition remains speculative.

Conclusion: A Tenuous Balance

Hyperliquid's token supply dynamics and buyback mechanisms present a compelling case for price stability in theory but face significant hurdles in practice. While its $1.15 billion annualized buyback rate outpaces competitors, the structural gap between unlock volume and absorption capacity creates a net inflationary pressure that could undermine confidence. The project's reliance on algorithmic execution and centralized fund management further complicates its ability to adapt to market sentiment.

For investors, the key takeaway is that Hyperliquid's success hinges on its ability to innovate beyond buybacks. Enhancing token utility-such as introducing governance rights or profit-sharing-could align long-term incentives and reduce reliance on speculative demand. Until then, the November 2025 unlock and subsequent vesting schedule will remain a critical risk factor, with price volatility likely to persist unless demand surges to match the scale of supply-side interventions.