Hiperliquido (HYPE): ¿Es la ruptura del patrón “Bear Flag” una señal de venta o una oportunidad de compra?

Generado por agente de IAAdrian HoffnerRevisado porTianhao Xu
lunes, 12 de enero de 2026, 1:06 am ET3 min de lectura

The cryptocurrency market has long thrived on the tension between technical precision and sentiment-driven chaos. For Hyperliquid (HYPE), this tension is crystallizing in December 2025 as a bear flag pattern near $25 clashes with mixed on-chain and market sentiment signals. The question looms: Is the current breakdown a structural collapse or a temporary correction? To answer, we dissect the technical bear flag, juxtapose it with divergent sentiment metrics, and evaluate strategic entry/exit points amid looming catalysts.

Technical Bear Flag: A Continuation of Decline

Hyperliquid's price action has formed a textbook bear flag pattern on the 12-hour chart, characterized by a sharp decline followed by consolidation within an upward channel. Key levels include resistance at $27 and support near $24.64. Analysts like Ali Martinez argue that

, with the 9-period EMA lagging beneath the 21-period EMA and the MACD remaining in bearish territory (MACD line below signal line, negative histogram).

Volume analysis reinforces this bearish narrative. The liquidity area around $28 has been cleared, indicating sustained seller control. Meanwhile,

-a procedural step toward potential ETF filings-has yet to translate into immediate price support, as traders remain cautious. The bear flag's completion hinges on whether HYPE can hold above $24.64 before the February 2026 token unlock, which .

Sentiment Divergence: Fear, Growth, and Structural Uncertainty


While technicals scream bearishness, sentiment metrics tell a more nuanced story.

by December 19, 2025, reflecting widespread pessimism. However, this fear is not uniformly aligned with on-chain activity.

Hyperliquid's user base has exploded in 2025,

-driven by innovations like HyperEVM and Hypurr NFTs. . These metrics suggest structural adoption, yet they clash with .

News-driven optimism further complicates the narrative. Bitwise's ETF filings and forecasts of M&A and institutional adoption in 2026

. However, these positives are overshadowed by immediate headwinds: token unlocks, , and .

Structural vs. Temporary Breakdown: A Tale of Two Metrics


The bear flag's validity depends on whether the current selloff is structural (driven by fundamental weaknesses) or temporary (a correction within a broader bullish trend).

Structural Risks:
- Token Unlock Pressure: The February 2026 unlock introduces 9.92 million HYPE tokens,

.
- NVT Ratio Dynamics: While specific NVT values for December 2025 are unavailable, the platform's $2.95 trillion in 2025 transactions and $6 billion TVL suggest a healthy network, but declining trading volume raises questions about sustainability .

Temporary Factors:
- Fear-Driven Overselling: The Fear & Greed Index at 16 indicates extreme pessimism,

. History shows such levels can precede rebounds if fundamentals hold.
- Strategic Market Share Shifts: Hyperliquid's pivot to B2B infrastructure and reduced liquidity incentives but could strengthen long-term positioning.

Strategic Entry/Exit Points: Navigating the Divergence

For traders, the key lies in exploiting the divergence between technical bearishness and structural optimism.

  1. Bear Flag Breakdown as a Sell Signal:
  2. Exit Strategy: Traders holding HYPE should consider selling .
  3. Risk Mitigation: The February token unlock poses a critical risk; exiting before this event could preserve capital.

  4. Buying Opportunity Amid Divergence:

  5. Entry Strategy: If HYPE retests the $25 support zone without breaking it, the bear flag pattern may fail, . This scenario assumes the February unlock is absorbed by strong buyback programs or ETF-related demand.
  6. Sentiment Catalysts: A rebound in the Fear & Greed Index (e.g., above 50) or positive ETF news could trigger a short-term rally.

Conclusion: A High-Risk, High-Reward Dilemma

Hyperliquid's bear flag pattern and bearish technicals paint a grim short-term outlook, but the platform's user growth and long-term catalysts (ETFs, institutional adoption) suggest resilience. The divergence between fear-driven selling and structural adoption creates a high-risk, high-reward scenario. For risk-tolerant investors, a strategic entry near $25 could pay off if the bear flag fails. For others, the February token unlock serves as a clear exit signal. In the end, the market's verdict will hinge on whether Hyperliquid can convert its structural strengths into on-chain momentum before the next wave of selling pressure arrives.

author avatar
Adrian Hoffner

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios