Quema de Tokens de $1B de Hyperliquid: ¿Un reinicio estratégico para el valor a largo plazo?

The cryptocurrency market has long been a theater of grand gestures, and Hyperliquid's proposed $1 billion HYPE token burn is the latest act in this drama. The move, which seeks to permanently remove 13% of the circulating supply by reclassifying tokens in the protocol's Assistance Fund as "burned," has been framed as a bold step to stabilize the token's fundamentals amid a steep price decline and intensifying competition. But does this maneuver represent a genuine strategic reset, or is it a desperate attempt to mask deeper structural weaknesses?

The Mechanics of the Burn and Its Immediate Implications

Hyperliquid's burn proposal hinges on a technical nuance: the tokens in question are already stored in a system address without a private key, rendering them irretrievable without a hard fork. By formally recognizing these tokens as burned, the protocol aims to align its reported supply metrics with its actual mechanics, reducing both circulating and total supply calculations. This reclassification, if approved by validators by December 24, could create a narrative of scarcity, a critical factor in crypto markets where perception often drives reality.

.

The move also addresses a key criticism of HYPE's economics: the dilutionary pressure from token unlocks. By locking away 37 million tokens-worth approximately $1 billion at current prices-the foundation is signaling a commitment to deflationary mechanics. Analysts at Cantor Fitzgerald have noted that this could position HYPE to rival BNB's burn rate, with an estimated 12–15% annual token burn based on current trading volumes. However, the effectiveness of this strategy depends on whether the burn translates into reduced selling pressure or merely shifts the burden to future token issuance.

Market Share and Competitive Pressures

Hyperliquid's challenges extend beyond token economics. The decentralized perpetuals market has become a battleground, with platforms like Aster and Lighter capturing 70% of Q4 2025's volume growth through aggressive incentives and airdrops. Aster, despite its rocky start-marked by a delisting from DefiLlama and questions about its legitimacy-still commands 19.3% of the market share according to data. Lighter, meanwhile, has leveraged a user-friendly interface and reduced fees to overtake Aster in 24-hour volume, recording $7.5 billion in late Q4 compared to Aster's $6.7 billion.

Hyperliquid's response has been to highlight its $874 million in year-to-date fees and its $221 billion monthly trading volume according to reports. Yet these figures mask a troubling trend: HYPE's price has plummeted over 50% from its September high, and its spot volume has fallen from a mid-October peak of $30 billion to roughly $8 billion according to market data. The burn, while symbolic, does not address the root issue-Hyperliquid's inability to retain market share in a landscape where user acquisition is increasingly driven by points programs and liquidity incentives.

Expert Analysis and Market Reactions

The market's reaction to the burn proposal has been mixed. While HYPE initially rallied on the announcement, the token has since retreated below key support levels, reflecting broader crypto market weakness. According to data from CoinGecko, HYPE is trading near $24 as of December 18, 2025, a 60% drop from its all-time high. Analysts at Bitcoinist argue that the burn may not be enough to reverse investor sentiment unless it is accompanied by a sustained increase in trading volume and a clear differentiation from competitors according to market analysis.

Cantor Fitzgerald, however, remains bullish on Hyperliquid's fee-driven model, projecting billions in annual fees if adoption continues. The firm emphasizes that the burn could reinforce HYPE's narrative as a "financially robust" protocol rather than a speculative DeFi token according to financial reports. Yet this optimism clashes with the reality that Hyperliquid's open interest-while substantial-pales in comparison to its trading volume, suggesting high turnover but limited capital commitment.

Long-Term Strategic Considerations

The ultimate success of the burn will depend on two factors: the protocol's ability to maintain or grow its trading volume and the broader market's appetite for deflationary assets. If Hyperliquid can sustain its $221 billion monthly volume, the burn could create a self-reinforcing cycle of fee generation and supply reduction. However, this assumes that the protocol can outmaneuver competitors like Lighter, which has attracted 600,000 users in Q4 2025 through aggressive onboarding strategies according to user growth data.

Regulatory risks also loom large. As Hyperliquid expands into tokenized assets, it may face scrutiny over its governance model and token utility, which could undermine the burn's symbolic value according to market analysts. Moreover, the burn's effectiveness is contingent on validator consensus-a process that, while stake-weighted, is not immune to manipulation or short-termism.

Conclusion

Hyperliquid's $1 billion token burn is a calculated attempt to reset the narrative around HYPE's fundamentals. By reducing supply and aligning metrics with reality, the protocol aims to signal long-term commitment to deflationary economics. Yet in a market defined by rapid innovation and cutthroat competition, such gestures are insufficient without a clear path to differentiation and sustained volume growth. The burn may stabilize HYPE's trajectory in the short term, but it cannot erase the structural challenges posed by rivals or the broader crypto market's volatility. For investors, the question remains: Is this a strategic reset, or merely a temporary salve for a deeper wound?