High-Yield Structured ETFs: Decoding the Risks and Rewards of CONY and ULTY

In the pursuit of income generation, investors increasingly turn to high-yield structured ETFs, lured by their promise of weekly payouts and elevated returns. Among these, the YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and the YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) stand out as case studies in the trade-offs between yield sustainability, volatility exposure, and capital preservation. While both ETFs employ options strategies to generate income, their divergent performance and structural nuances reveal critical lessons for investors navigating the high-frequency income landscape.

Performance Divergence: A Tale of Two ETFs

From 2023 to 2025, CONY and ULTY exhibited starkly different trajectories. CONY delivered a 3-year average annual return of 35.20%, though it fell to a -30.33% return over the past 12 months as of November 2025. In contrast, ULTY's performance was far more volatile, with a cumulative return of -74.88% from February 2024 to December 2025. Despite CONY's own struggles-marked by a Sharpe ratio of -0.52 and a Sortino ratio of -0.44-it outperformed ULTY, which faced a maximum drawdown of -77.08%. This divergence underscores the importance of volatility management in options-based strategies.

Volatility Exposure and Strategy Design

The structural differences between CONY and ULTY help explain their performance. ULTY's strategy involves writing options on a concentrated portfolio of 15–30 highly volatile stocks, aiming to capture premium income. This approach amplifies both upside potential and downside risk, as evidenced by ULTY's steep losses during market corrections. CONY, by contrast, appears to adopt a broader, less concentrated approach, which may mitigate extreme volatility. For instance, CONY's 2024 total return of 23.62% contrasts sharply with ULTY's -50.05% return in the same year as of December 2025, highlighting the role of strategy design in risk-adjusted outcomes.

Return Composition and Hidden Costs

A critical factor in assessing these ETFs is the composition of their distributions. CONY's trailing 12-month dividend yield reached 175.56%, while ULTY's forward yield stood at 7.7% as of November 2025. However, these figures mask significant hidden costs. Both ETFs rely heavily on return of capital (ROC) to fund payouts. For example, CONY's November 2025 distribution included 93.76% ROC, while ULTY's strategy adjustments in early 2025 helped it achieve a 44% total return since the bear market bottom. Analysts warn that ROC erodes net asset value over time, effectively returning investors' own capital rather than generating sustainable income.

Yield Sustainability and Investor Considerations

The sustainability of high yields in structured ETFs hinges on market conditions and strategy adaptability. CONY's frequent dividend adjustments-17 reductions in three years-signal fragility in its payout model. ULTY, meanwhile, faces scrutiny for its aggressive covered call strategy, which exposes it to unlimited downside risk during sharp market declines. For non-U.S. investors, tax implications further complicate the picture, as ROC distributions may trigger complex tax treatments.

Navigating the High-Yield Maze

Investors seeking income from structured ETFs must prioritize long-term value over short-term yield. Key considerations include:
1. Risk-Adjusted Metrics: Sharpe and Sortino ratios, while negative for both ETFs, reveal CONY's relatively better performance in volatile markets.
2. Volatility Tolerance: ULTY's concentrated, high-volatility approach suits aggressive investors, while CONY's broader strategy may appeal to those seeking moderate risk.
3. Return Composition Analysis: Scrutinizing ROC percentages and NAV trends is essential to avoid the illusion of high yields.

Conclusion

CONY's outperformance of ULTY, despite similar structures, highlights the nuanced interplay of volatility exposure, return composition, and strategy design. While both ETFs offer alluring yields, their hidden costs-particularly ROC-driven capital erosion-pose significant risks to long-term value. For investors, the lesson is clear: high-frequency income strategies demand rigorous due diligence, balancing headline yields with structural risks and sustainability. In a market where volatility is inevitable, the true test of a structured ETF lies not in its payout frequency but in its ability to preserve capital while delivering meaningful returns.

.