La intensa batalla por los recompensas de las stablecoins en el proyecto de ley CLARITY

The CLARITY Act of 2025, formally the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, has ignited a fierce regulatory and strategic battle over stablecoin rewards, reshaping the landscape for investors in both crypto and traditional finance. As the U.S. Congress seeks to clarify jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, the act's provisions-particularly those targeting stablecoin incentives-have forced market participants to recalibrate their strategies amid unprecedented regulatory scrutiny.

The Regulatory Crossroads: CLARITY vs. Loopholes

The CLARITY Act aims to end the regulatory ambiguity that has allowed crypto platforms to exploit gaps in the GENIUS Act of 2024. While the GENIUS Act prohibited stablecoin issuers from directly paying yield on their tokens, it left a critical loophole: intermediaries like exchanges could still offer rewards on stablecoins they custody. This has enabled crypto-native firms to indirectly compete with traditional banks by providing yield-like incentives through affiliated platforms, drawing criticism from the American Bankers Association's Community Bankers Council, which warns of systemic risks to credit availability for small businesses.

The CLARITY Act seeks to close this gap by tightening oversight of stablecoin rewards, but its passage through the Senate remains contentious. Lawmakers are grappling with balancing innovation and financial stability, as decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms and stablecoin issuers lobby to preserve flexibility while traditional banks demand stricter alignment with legacy banking regulations.

Strategic Positioning: Crypto vs. Traditional Finance

Investors in crypto and traditional finance are adopting divergent strategies to navigate this regulatory uncertainty.

1. Crypto-Native Firms: Innovation Under Scrutiny
Crypto platforms are pivoting toward compliance-driven product design to avoid regulatory backlash. For instance, exchanges are restructuring their reward programs to ensure they do not directly incentivize stablecoin holdings, instead focusing on liquidity provision and staking derivatives. Meanwhile, tokenization is accelerating, with tokenized money market funds amassing over $8 billion in assets under management by late 2025, offering investors yield without directly violating stablecoin reward restrictions.

However, the regulatory ambiguity persists. As one industry analyst notes, "Crypto firms are walking a tightrope-innovating fast enough to stay competitive while avoiding the SEC's enforcement gaze."

2. Traditional Finance: Embracing the Digital Transition
Traditional institutions are aggressively integrating crypto infrastructure to counter stablecoin-driven deposit outflows. JPMorgan, for example, launched tokenized money market funds in 2025, enabling institutional investors to access yield while adhering to regulatory guardrails. Similarly, U.S. banks are piloting stablecoin-based payment systems, leveraging their reserve-backed nature for faster cross-border transactions.

The SEC's shift from enforcement to innovation-marked by the approval of generic listing standards for crypto ETFs-has further normalized digital assets in institutional portfolios. By Q3 2025, stablecoin assets under management (AUM) surged to $275 billion, with traditional banks capturing a growing share of the market through custody and settlement services.

Global Implications and Investor Risks

The CLARITY Act's impact extends beyond U.S. borders. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework and Singapore's rapid regulatory rollout have created a patchwork of global standards, forcing investors to adopt region-specific compliance strategies. For example, stablecoin issuers operating in both the U.S. and EU must now navigate conflicting reserve requirements and AML programs, increasing operational complexity.

Investors must also weigh the risk of regulatory arbitrage. If the CLARITY Act fails to fully close the stablecoin reward loophole, capital may flow to jurisdictions with laxer rules, undermining U.S. financial stability. As a report by Chainalysis highlights, "Regulatory fragmentation remains the single greatest threat to the long-term viability of stablecoins."

The Path Forward: Balancing Innovation and Stability

For investors, the key to success lies in aligning with regulatory expectations while maintaining agility. Crypto-native firms should prioritize governance frameworks that demonstrate compliance with emerging standards, while traditional institutions must accelerate their adoption of tokenized infrastructure to remain competitive. The Senate's final version of the CLARITY Act will likely determine the trajectory of stablecoin rewards. If it successfully closes the intermediary loophole, crypto platforms may pivot to DeFi-based yield mechanisms, while traditional banks could dominate custody and settlement. Conversely, a diluted bill may prolong regulatory uncertainty, favoring nimble players who can exploit jurisdictional gray areas.

In this high-stakes environment, strategic positioning is not just about compliance-it's about anticipating the next move in a regulatory chess game where the rules are still being written.