Grok 3's Brief Censorship: A Glimpse into AI's Political Leanings
Generado por agente de IAWesley Park
domingo, 23 de febrero de 2025, 1:26 pm ET1 min de lectura
GREK--
In a recent live stream, Elon Musk introduced Grok 3, xAI's latest flagship model, as a "maximally truth-seeking AI." However, it appears that Grok 3 briefly censored unflattering facts about President Donald Trump and Musk himself. This censorship raises questions about the AI's political leanings and the role of training data in shaping its biases.
Over the weekend, users on social media reported that, when asked "Who is the biggest misinformation spreader?" with the "Think" setting enabled, Grok 3 noted in its "chain of thought" that it was explicitly instructed not to mention Donald Trump or Elon Musk. TechCrunch was able to replicate this behavior once, but as of publication time on Sunday morning, Grok 3 was once again mentioning Trump in its answer to the misinformation query.
While "misinformation" can be a politically charged and contested category, both Trump and Musk have repeatedly spread claims that were demonstrably false. In the past week alone, they've advanced the false narratives that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is a "dictator" with a 4% public approval rating, and that Ukraine started the ongoing conflict with Russia. The controversial apparent tweak to Grok 3 comes as some criticize the model as being too left-leaning.
This week, users discovered that Grok 3 would consistently say that President Donald Trump and Musk deserve the death penalty. xAI quickly patched the issue; Igor Babuschkin, the company's head of engineering, called it a "really terrible and bad failure." When Musk announced Grok roughly two years ago, he pitched the AI model as edgy, unfiltered, and anti-“woke” — in general, willing to answer controversial questions other AI systems won't. He delivered on some of that promise, but Grok models prior to Grok 3 hedged on political subjects and wouldn't cross certain boundaries.
Musk has blamed the behavior on Grok's training data — public web pages — and pledged to "shift Grok closer to politically neutral." Others, including OpenAI, have followed suit, perhaps spurred by the Trump Administration's accusations of conservative censorship.
XFLT--

In a recent live stream, Elon Musk introduced Grok 3, xAI's latest flagship model, as a "maximally truth-seeking AI." However, it appears that Grok 3 briefly censored unflattering facts about President Donald Trump and Musk himself. This censorship raises questions about the AI's political leanings and the role of training data in shaping its biases.
Over the weekend, users on social media reported that, when asked "Who is the biggest misinformation spreader?" with the "Think" setting enabled, Grok 3 noted in its "chain of thought" that it was explicitly instructed not to mention Donald Trump or Elon Musk. TechCrunch was able to replicate this behavior once, but as of publication time on Sunday morning, Grok 3 was once again mentioning Trump in its answer to the misinformation query.
While "misinformation" can be a politically charged and contested category, both Trump and Musk have repeatedly spread claims that were demonstrably false. In the past week alone, they've advanced the false narratives that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is a "dictator" with a 4% public approval rating, and that Ukraine started the ongoing conflict with Russia. The controversial apparent tweak to Grok 3 comes as some criticize the model as being too left-leaning.
This week, users discovered that Grok 3 would consistently say that President Donald Trump and Musk deserve the death penalty. xAI quickly patched the issue; Igor Babuschkin, the company's head of engineering, called it a "really terrible and bad failure." When Musk announced Grok roughly two years ago, he pitched the AI model as edgy, unfiltered, and anti-“woke” — in general, willing to answer controversial questions other AI systems won't. He delivered on some of that promise, but Grok models prior to Grok 3 hedged on political subjects and wouldn't cross certain boundaries.
Musk has blamed the behavior on Grok's training data — public web pages — and pledged to "shift Grok closer to politically neutral." Others, including OpenAI, have followed suit, perhaps spurred by the Trump Administration's accusations of conservative censorship.
Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema


Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios