GPT-5 update sparks backlash on Reddit, users call it 'horrible'
PorAinvest
viernes, 8 de agosto de 2025, 2:27 pm ET1 min de lectura
RDDT--
OpenAI has touted GPT-5 as a significant leap in intelligence over previous models, featuring state-of-the-art performance in coding, math, writing, health, and visual perception [1]. However, these advancements have not been well-received by users who have experienced reduced functionality and increased limitations. The new model, while promising, has yet to live up to expectations in terms of user satisfaction and reliability.
Paying customers, who have subscribed to ChatGPT Plus for extended usage and access to advanced features, are particularly upset. The new usage limits have been seen as a step backward, especially as users now have to manage their interactions more carefully. The hard cap of 200 messages per week has led to frustration, with users feeling that their subscription does not provide the value it once did.
The criticism highlights the importance of user experience and the need for companies to balance innovation with user satisfaction. While GPT-5 offers impressive capabilities, the implementation has left much to be desired. OpenAI will need to address these issues to regain user trust and ensure that the new model is not only technologically advanced but also user-friendly.
References:
[1] https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5/
The recent GPT-5 update from OpenAI has received widespread criticism on Reddit, with thousands of users calling it "horrible." The update has been criticized for taking away features, stricter usage limits, and poor performance. Paying customers, including ChatGPT Plus subscribers, are particularly upset as they now have limited access to models and a hard limit of 200 messages per week. Many users want the old models reinstated until GPT-5's bugs are fixed.
The recent update to OpenAI's GPT-5 model has sparked widespread criticism, particularly on Reddit, where thousands of users have expressed their discontent. The update, which introduced stricter usage limits and a hard cap of 200 messages per week for ChatGPT Plus subscribers, has been met with significant backlash. Users have cited issues such as the removal of features, poor performance, and the reinstatement of older models as key concerns.OpenAI has touted GPT-5 as a significant leap in intelligence over previous models, featuring state-of-the-art performance in coding, math, writing, health, and visual perception [1]. However, these advancements have not been well-received by users who have experienced reduced functionality and increased limitations. The new model, while promising, has yet to live up to expectations in terms of user satisfaction and reliability.
Paying customers, who have subscribed to ChatGPT Plus for extended usage and access to advanced features, are particularly upset. The new usage limits have been seen as a step backward, especially as users now have to manage their interactions more carefully. The hard cap of 200 messages per week has led to frustration, with users feeling that their subscription does not provide the value it once did.
The criticism highlights the importance of user experience and the need for companies to balance innovation with user satisfaction. While GPT-5 offers impressive capabilities, the implementation has left much to be desired. OpenAI will need to address these issues to regain user trust and ensure that the new model is not only technologically advanced but also user-friendly.
References:
[1] https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5/

Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios