German Court Rules Apple Watch Not Actually Carbon Neutral
PorAinvest
martes, 26 de agosto de 2025, 9:05 am ET1 min de lectura
AAPL--
Apple calculates the carbon footprint of an Apple Watch at around 8kg CO2, an estimated reduction of 80% compared to 2015. The company offsets carbon credits for each product sold to achieve net carbon neutrality. However, the German court's decision suggests that Apple's marketing may have overstated the environmental benefits of its products.
The ruling comes at a time when Apple is facing legal challenges over its health technology features. Masimo Corp., a medical technology firm, has accused Apple of infringing on its pulse oximetry patents. Masimo has filed a lawsuit against U.S. Customs and Border Protection for reversing its prior ruling on the import of Apple's Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches, which had been blocked due to patent infringement claims.
The Apple Watch has been positioned as a critical health and wellness device, with Apple exploring broader ambitions such as noninvasive glucose monitoring. Rivals like Samsung Electronics and Alphabet Inc.'s Google are also advancing health-focused smartwatch features, intensifying competition in the wearable space.
Apple's stock price dropped 1.97% during regular trading and slipped an additional 0.18% in after-hours trading following the German court's ruling. Despite this, Benzinga's Edge Stock Rankings indicate that AAPL maintains strong momentum across short, medium, and long-term timeframes.
References:
[1] https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/25/08/47252149/apple-restores-blood-oxygen-tracking-to-watch-after-customs-ruling-masimo-strikes-back-with-lawsuit-over-patent-rights
A German court has ruled that Apple's claim of the Apple Watch being carbon neutral is misleading. The court found that Apple misled consumers by describing the Apple Watch as a CO2-neutral product. The ruling means that Apple must alter or remove language relating to the devices being carbon neutral in German retail locations and online stores. Apple calculates the carbon footprint of an Apple Watch at around 8kg CO2, an estimated reduction of 80% compared to 2015, and offsets carbon credits for each product sold to achieve net carbon neutrality.
A German court has ruled that Apple's claim of the Apple Watch being carbon neutral is misleading. The court found that Apple misled consumers by describing the Apple Watch as a CO2-neutral product. This ruling means that Apple must alter or remove language relating to the devices being carbon neutral in German retail locations and online stores.Apple calculates the carbon footprint of an Apple Watch at around 8kg CO2, an estimated reduction of 80% compared to 2015. The company offsets carbon credits for each product sold to achieve net carbon neutrality. However, the German court's decision suggests that Apple's marketing may have overstated the environmental benefits of its products.
The ruling comes at a time when Apple is facing legal challenges over its health technology features. Masimo Corp., a medical technology firm, has accused Apple of infringing on its pulse oximetry patents. Masimo has filed a lawsuit against U.S. Customs and Border Protection for reversing its prior ruling on the import of Apple's Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches, which had been blocked due to patent infringement claims.
The Apple Watch has been positioned as a critical health and wellness device, with Apple exploring broader ambitions such as noninvasive glucose monitoring. Rivals like Samsung Electronics and Alphabet Inc.'s Google are also advancing health-focused smartwatch features, intensifying competition in the wearable space.
Apple's stock price dropped 1.97% during regular trading and slipped an additional 0.18% in after-hours trading following the German court's ruling. Despite this, Benzinga's Edge Stock Rankings indicate that AAPL maintains strong momentum across short, medium, and long-term timeframes.
References:
[1] https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/25/08/47252149/apple-restores-blood-oxygen-tracking-to-watch-after-customs-ruling-masimo-strikes-back-with-lawsuit-over-patent-rights

Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios