The Food Pyramid Is Not America's Biggest Health Problem

Generado por agente de IAMarion LedgerRevisado porDavid Feng
miércoles, 7 de enero de 2026, 6:25 pm ET2 min de lectura

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has announced changes to the childhood immunization schedule, removing several vaccines from universal recommendations and shifting to shared clinical decision-making for others

. This has caused immediate concern among public health organizations, leading to legal action against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and other groups argue that the changes could lead to preventable disease outbreaks .

Merck, a top manufacturer of the HPV vaccine Gardasil, is expected to see a significant revenue decline due to the reduced recommendation for multiple doses. Jefferies analysts estimate that Gardasil sales could drop between $315 million and $630 million in 2026

. This comes at a critical time for as it approaches a patent cliff for Keytruda in 2028, another major revenue source.

Michigan health officials have already taken a different approach, advising families to follow immunization schedules from the American Academy of Pediatrics or the American Academy of Family Physicians instead of the new CDC guidelines

. This highlights growing confusion and resistance to the updated recommendations, especially among parents and healthcare providers accustomed to the previous schedule.

Why Did This Happen?

The court has rejected the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by leading public health groups challenging the vaccine schedule changes

. This ruling allows the case to proceed on its merits and reinforces the legal challenge to the recent shift in policy. The plaintiffs argue that the changes were not based on sound scientific evidence and could endanger public health.

Public health organizations have long emphasized the importance of universal vaccine coverage in preventing outbreaks of diseases like influenza and meningococcal illness. The American Public Health Association (APHA) has criticized the policy changes as politically motivated and lacking in scientific support

.

How Did Markets React?

Healthcare stocks have shown mixed reactions to the news. Merck's stock closed at $107.44 on January 5, a one-year high, as investors weighed the uncertainty surrounding the vaccine policy

. Other pharmaceutical companies are also affected, as the new recommendations could alter vaccine usage patterns. Sanofi, for instance, is currently in the process of expanding the age range for its Tzield diabetes drug, which may provide an alternative growth avenue amid shifting vaccine demand .

Investors are closely monitoring whether Merck will raise the price of Gardasil in the U.S. to offset the expected revenue decline. The company's stock has gained about 1% since the announcement, suggesting some level of investor confidence despite the uncertainty

.

What Are Analysts Watching Next?

Medical professionals are urging parents to continue working with their pediatricians to make informed decisions about vaccination

. Despite the changes, routine wellness visits remain important for children's health, even if some vaccines are no longer universally recommended. These visits help ensure that children receive critical screenings and guidance from healthcare providers.

The court case is expected to play a crucial role in determining the future of the new vaccine schedule. If the plaintiffs succeed, it could lead to a reversal of the policy or a requirement for further scientific review before implementing any changes. Analysts are also watching how quickly states like Michigan and others decide to adopt alternative schedules

.

The long-term implications of these changes for public health remain unclear. Some organizations, like the American Lung Association, have expressed concern about the decision to stop recommending the flu shot for all children

. With record-breaking flu seasons in recent years, the importance of vaccination remains a key topic of debate among health officials and parents alike.

The situation underscores the importance of clear, science-based guidance in public health policy. As the legal and medical communities continue to assess the impacts of the new recommendations, the focus remains on ensuring that children receive the protection they need against preventable diseases.

author avatar
Marion Ledger

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios