FDIC's Crypto Banking Resistance: A 790-Page Reveal
Generado por agente de IAHarrison Brooks
jueves, 6 de febrero de 2025, 3:57 am ET1 min de lectura
AIM--
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has released a trove of 790 pages of documents, shedding light on the agency's resistance to banks engaging in crypto-related activities. The documents, released ahead of a Senate Banking Committee hearing on alleged "debanking" by banks, provide insights into the FDIC's supervisory approach to crypto banking and its impact on the broader crypto industry.

Acting Chairman Travis Hill acknowledged the FDIC's past approach, stating, "I have been critical in the past of the FDIC’s approach to crypto assets and blockchain. Upon becoming Acting Chairman, I directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of all supervisory communications with banks that sought to offer crypto-related products or services." This review led to the release of the documents, demonstrating a commitment to enhancing transparency and fulfilling the spirit of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
The documents reveal that the FDIC sent 25 "pause" letters to 24 institutions interested in pursuing activities involving crypto or other digital assets. These letters effectively put a halt to the banks' plans, as Hill noted, "Both individually and collectively, these and other actions sent the message to banks that it would be extraordinarily difficult—if not impossible—to move forward." This resistance and delays in responses created a chilling effect, discouraging many banks from engaging with the crypto industry.
The FDIC's stance had significant consequences for the broader crypto industry. A survey by the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) found that approximately 75% of crypto-focused hedge funds faced obstacles with their banking services, compared to none in other alternative investment sectors. This disparity in banking accessibility raised concerns about systematic exclusion and discrimination against the crypto industry.
Paul Grewal, Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer, questioned the systematic exclusion of crypto entities from banking services, while Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, described the situation as a form of gaslighting that made some in the industry question the legitimacy of their experiences.

Industry stakeholders are hopeful for a shift with President Donald Trump's more crypto-friendly incoming administration. David Sacks, the newly appointed AI and Crypto Czar, stressed the need to investigate these restrictive banking practices while acknowledging the damage they have inflicted on crypto-related businesses.
In conclusion, the FDIC's "pause" letters and other supervisory communications played a crucial role in shaping the regulatory environment for crypto banking, effectively discouraging banks from engaging in crypto-related activities. This chilling effect had a notable impact on the growth and development of the crypto sector, as evidenced by the banking challenges faced by crypto funds and the concerns raised by industry executives. The potential shift with a new administration suggests that the regulatory environment for crypto banking may change in the future.
COIN--
ETHW--
SPR--
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has released a trove of 790 pages of documents, shedding light on the agency's resistance to banks engaging in crypto-related activities. The documents, released ahead of a Senate Banking Committee hearing on alleged "debanking" by banks, provide insights into the FDIC's supervisory approach to crypto banking and its impact on the broader crypto industry.

Acting Chairman Travis Hill acknowledged the FDIC's past approach, stating, "I have been critical in the past of the FDIC’s approach to crypto assets and blockchain. Upon becoming Acting Chairman, I directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of all supervisory communications with banks that sought to offer crypto-related products or services." This review led to the release of the documents, demonstrating a commitment to enhancing transparency and fulfilling the spirit of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
The documents reveal that the FDIC sent 25 "pause" letters to 24 institutions interested in pursuing activities involving crypto or other digital assets. These letters effectively put a halt to the banks' plans, as Hill noted, "Both individually and collectively, these and other actions sent the message to banks that it would be extraordinarily difficult—if not impossible—to move forward." This resistance and delays in responses created a chilling effect, discouraging many banks from engaging with the crypto industry.
The FDIC's stance had significant consequences for the broader crypto industry. A survey by the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) found that approximately 75% of crypto-focused hedge funds faced obstacles with their banking services, compared to none in other alternative investment sectors. This disparity in banking accessibility raised concerns about systematic exclusion and discrimination against the crypto industry.
Paul Grewal, Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer, questioned the systematic exclusion of crypto entities from banking services, while Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, described the situation as a form of gaslighting that made some in the industry question the legitimacy of their experiences.

Industry stakeholders are hopeful for a shift with President Donald Trump's more crypto-friendly incoming administration. David Sacks, the newly appointed AI and Crypto Czar, stressed the need to investigate these restrictive banking practices while acknowledging the damage they have inflicted on crypto-related businesses.
In conclusion, the FDIC's "pause" letters and other supervisory communications played a crucial role in shaping the regulatory environment for crypto banking, effectively discouraging banks from engaging in crypto-related activities. This chilling effect had a notable impact on the growth and development of the crypto sector, as evidenced by the banking challenges faced by crypto funds and the concerns raised by industry executives. The potential shift with a new administration suggests that the regulatory environment for crypto banking may change in the future.
Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios