Fangdd shares surge 28.27% intraday after $34.32M convertible bond conversion boosts liquidity.

think> Okay, let's tackle this query. The user wants me to transform a given Chinese text into a concise news headline following specific rules. First, I need to make sure I understand all the requirements. The example provided shows that the headline should include the company name, percentage change rounded to two decimals, the time period (premarket, intraday, after-hours), and a brief reason for the price movement. The rules mention keeping the company name as is, rounding the percentage, adding the time period, and providing a concise reason with key info. Looking at the input text: "Fangdd盘中 intraday大涨28.26811594%, 1、公司于2025年10月24日签订可转债协议筹集资金3432万美元，并于2025年12月5日收到投资者转换通知，涉及3432万美元可转债转换为股票，此资本运作影响长期流动性。 2、房多多主营业务为在线房地产信息平台，提供房产交易服务和综合营销解决方案，覆盖开发商、代理商及个人客户，服务范围包括房地产咨询。 ，，）" First, the company name is "Fangdd", but in the example, the company name was in English. However, the user mentioned to keep the company name unchanged. The original text uses "Fangdd" but the Chinese part says "房多多", which is the Chinese name. Wait, but the example used the English name "Pineapple Energy Inc." even though the input had Chinese text. So maybe "Fangdd" is the English name here. The user might want to keep "Fangdd" as the company name. So I'll use "Fangdd" in the headline. Next, the percentage change is 28.26811594%, which needs to be rounded to two decimal places. That would be 28.27%. The time period is "intraday". The reason for the price movement is the two points listed. The first point is about a convertible bond agreement and conversion. The second point is about the company's main business. The example included both points but in the output, the first part was the announcement and the second part was the company's focus. So I need to combine these two points into a brief reason. The first point is the main driver for the stock movement, so the headline should mention the convertible debt conversion. The second point is more about the company's business, which can be included as part of the reason but maybe not necessary for the headline. Wait, the example included the company's focus in the second paragraph, but the user's instruction says "brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." So the key info here is the convertible bond conversion. The second point is more about the company's services, which might not directly explain the price movement. However, the example included both the project announcement and the company's focus. So maybe in this case, the main reason is the convertible debt conversion, and the company's business is additional info. Let me check the example again. The example's first sentence includes the project announcement as the reason, and the second sentence explains the company's focus. So in this case, the first point (convertible debt conversion) is the reason, and the second point (business description) is part of the company's background. However, the user's instruction says "brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." So the key info is the convertible debt conversion. The second point is more about the company's services, which might not be necessary for the reason unless it's part of the cause. But the example included the company's focus in the second paragraph. So perhaps in this case, the headline should mention the convertible debt conversion as the reason, and then in the second paragraph, mention the company's business. Let me structure it like the example. So the headline would start with "Fangdd surged 28.27% intraday, as the company announced the conversion of $34.32 million in convertible debt..." Then, the second paragraph would explain the company's main business. Wait, but the user's example has the company's announcement in the first part and the company's focus in the second. So I need to follow that structure. Let me put the key reason first, then the company's business. Also, the example included the date of the agreement and the conversion date. Should I include those? The example didn't include the date, just mentioned the event. So maybe just mention the conversion of the convertible debt. The input mentions the dates, but the example didn't include them. So perhaps it's better to omit the dates unless they are crucial. The key info is the conversion of $34.32 million in convertible debt into shares, which affects long-term liquidity. So the reason is the capital operation (convertible debt conversion).