Ethereum News Today: In Crypto AI Race, Discipline Beats Aggression as DeepSeek Surpasses Rivals

Generado por agente de IACoin WorldRevisado porAInvest News Editorial Team
lunes, 27 de octubre de 2025, 12:39 am ET2 min de lectura
BTC--
XRP--
DOGE--
BNB--
BLUR--

In a groundbreaking live trading experiment, DeepSeek AI achieved a 35% return in just three days, outperforming major competitors like Qwen3 and GPT-5 in a high-stakes crypto trading competition, according to a BeInCrypto report. Conducted by Alpha Arena, the test pitted six leading AI models against each other, each starting with $10,000 to trade BTCBTC--, ETH, SOL, XRPXRP--, DOGEDOGE--, and BNBBNB-- on Hyperliquid's perpetual markets. DeepSeek's disciplined approach—spreading risk across all six assets, maintaining strict stop-loss rules, and preserving a $4,900 cash buffer—allowed it to capitalize on the altcoin rally during the trial period, according to a SuperEx article. The experiment, which concluded on October 20, 2025, underscored the growing potential of AI-driven trading strategies in volatile markets.

The Alpha Arena competition revealed stark contrasts in AI performance. While DeepSeek's diversified, rule-based strategy yielded a 35% return, Qwen3 Max—a major domestic rival—suffered a 0.25% loss by overcommitting to BitcoinBTC-- alone, the BeInCrypto report noted. GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro fared worse, with the latter incurring a 33% loss after taking a short position on BNB during a market rally, the SuperEx article reported. The results highlight the importance of risk management and adaptability in algorithmic trading. DeepSeek's unrealized profits were evenly distributed across assets, with ETH and SOL contributing the most, while its rivals often overconcentrated positions or failed to adjust to market shifts, as the BeInCrypto report observed.

The experiment's methodology emphasized autonomy and transparency. Each AI received identical prompts and real-time market data but operated without human intervention. The winning model, DeepSeek Chat V3.1, adhered strictly to its parameters, avoiding overtrading and maintaining positions until exit conditions were met, the BeInCrypto report described. This contrasts with models like Claude Sonnet 4.5, which held strong ETH/XRP positions but left 70% of its capital idle, limiting compounding potential, the SuperEx article noted. Analysts attribute DeepSeek's success to its balance of aggression and caution, leveraging 10x–20x leverage without exposing itself to liquidation risks, the BeInCrypto report added.

Beyond the competition, DeepSeek's growing influence extends into China's military and tech sectors. According to a MarketScreener report, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) has increasingly turned to DeepSeek for AI applications, with over a dozen procurement tenders referencing its models in 2025. This aligns with Beijing's push for "algorithmic sovereignty," reducing reliance on Western technology. While the military applications remain unconfirmed, the PLA's preference for DeepSeek over rivals like Alibaba's Qwen suggests the model's robustness in complex, high-stakes environments, the MarketScreener report observed.

For investors, the Alpha Arena results signal both opportunity and caution. While AI-driven trading can generate rapid returns, the experiment also exposed vulnerabilities, such as Gemini's disastrous BNB short or GPT-5's operational errors, the SuperEx article cautioned. Experts advise replicating such strategies in controlled environments before applying them to real capital. "This isn't investment advice," cautioned one analyst, noting that past performance does not guarantee future results, the BeInCrypto report reiterated. Nonetheless, the competition highlights AI's transformative potential in finance, with firms increasingly integrating machine learning for risk assessment, portfolio management, and high-frequency trading.

As the crypto market evolves, the line between human and machine traders continues to blurBLUR--. DeepSeek's dominance in Alpha Arena may foreshadow broader adoption of AI in trading, but it also raises questions about regulatory oversight and market fairness. For now, the experiment serves as a vivid demonstration of how algorithms—when designed with discipline and diversification—can navigate volatility more effectively than their human counterparts.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios