EMCORS 350 Million Volume Climbs to 302nd Market Rank as Analysts Back Growth and Shorts Rise 862 Percent

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Volume Radar
martes, 9 de septiembre de 2025, 7:04 pm ET1 min de lectura
ETC--

On September 9, 2025, , ranking 302nd in market activity. Analyst ratings remain cautiously optimistic, with a "Moderate Buy" consensus based on seven buy, two hold, and one sell recommendation. , , indicating potential valuation concerns. , , suggesting waning investor confidence. Meanwhile, , highlighting strong institutional backing despite reduced retail follow-through.

Dividend sustainability remains a key strength, . However, . Recent news sentiment, , slightly outperforms the construction sector but lacks significant momentum. Institutional activity has seen mixed movements, including reduced holdings by Ontario Teachers Pension Plan and increased stakes from Envestnet Asset Management, reflecting divergent strategic views. The company’s upcoming participation in the D.A. Davidson industrial conference may influence near-term visibility, though earnings revisions remain modest compared to historical performance.

To run a sound back-test I need to pin down a few practical details that aren’t fully specified yet: 1. Universe • Do you want to rank every U.S. listed common stock each day, or limit the universe to a subset (e.g., Russell 3000, Nasdaq-listed, large-caps, etcETC--.)? • If the universe includes thousands of tickers, please confirm you’re comfortable with that data volume (it materially affects both data retrieval time and transaction-cost assumptions). 2. Trade timing & pricing • Entry: Should we buy the top-500-by-volume list at today’s close or tomorrow’s open? • Exit: Should we liquidate all positions at the next day’s close (i.e., a full one-day holding period), or at the next day’s open? • Execution price basis: close-to-close, close-to-open, or open-to-close? 3. Weighting & position sizing • Equal-weight each name? (Typical for this type of test.) • Any per-name or per-day notional limit? • Assume no leverage, no shorting, and no transaction costs unless you specify otherwise. 4. Benchmark & performance statistics • Is SPY (S&P 500 ETF) an acceptable benchmark, or do you have another preference? • Any specific risk metrics you’d like (max drawdown, Sharpe, etc.) beyond the usual total / annualized return? Once I have these details I can assemble the data-retrieval plan and run the back-test.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios