Eli Lilly, Biogen, and Eisai face scrutiny for Alzheimer's disease drug efficacy
PorAinvest
jueves, 7 de agosto de 2025, 2:33 pm ET1 min de lectura
BIIB--
The companies highlighted the long-term effectiveness of their drugs, with Eli Lilly reporting that Kisunla slowed down early Alzheimer's disease progression by 0.6 points at 18 months and by 1.2 points at 3 years, compared to a placebo group. Biogen and Eisai reported similar results for Leqembi, with a 0.45-point less decline at 18 months and a 1.01-point less decline at 3 years [1].
However, the trial designs and populations used in these studies were criticized for being misleading. Both Eli Lilly and Biogen compared the effects of their drugs against a placebo group that included both APOE4 and non-APOE4 carriers in "early" Alzheimer's disease. This approach produced misleading results, as APOE4 carriers progress more rapidly than non-carriers in Alzheimer's disease [1].
Moreover, the companies' data showed that anti-amyloid antibody drugs had almost no impact on non-carriers, who have very little amyloid in their brains. This raises questions about the cost-effectiveness of these drugs, given their high annual list prices of $26,500 for Leqembi and $32,000 for Kisunla [1].
The findings have sparked debate about the potential benefits and limitations of anti-amyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease. While the drugs may have a minimally clinically significant reduction in disease progression for APOE4 carriers, the risks and costs associated with these treatments are a concern. The debate highlights the need for more robust clinical trials and real-world data to better understand the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these drugs.
References:
[1] https://seekingalpha.com/article/4810476-eli-lilly-biogen-eisai-muddying-alzheimers-disease-expensive-drugs-little-benefit
[2] https://www.precisionmedicineonline.com/business-news/eli-lilly-eisai-share-data-differing-treatment-duration-strategies-pricey-alzheimers
LLY--
Eli Lilly, Biogen, and Eisai presented long-term data on their anti-amyloid Alzheimer's disease drugs at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference. The data showed that the drugs were effective in slowing cognitive decline, but the results were muddled by differences in trial designs and populations. The findings have sparked debate about the potential benefits and limitations of anti-amyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease.
Eli Lilly, Biogen, and Eisai presented long-term data on their anti-amyloid Alzheimer's disease drugs at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) in Toronto. The companies showcased the effectiveness of their drugs, Kisunla (donanemab) and Leqembi (lecanemab), in slowing cognitive decline. However, the results were clouded by differences in trial designs and populations, sparking debate about the potential benefits and limitations of anti-amyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease.The companies highlighted the long-term effectiveness of their drugs, with Eli Lilly reporting that Kisunla slowed down early Alzheimer's disease progression by 0.6 points at 18 months and by 1.2 points at 3 years, compared to a placebo group. Biogen and Eisai reported similar results for Leqembi, with a 0.45-point less decline at 18 months and a 1.01-point less decline at 3 years [1].
However, the trial designs and populations used in these studies were criticized for being misleading. Both Eli Lilly and Biogen compared the effects of their drugs against a placebo group that included both APOE4 and non-APOE4 carriers in "early" Alzheimer's disease. This approach produced misleading results, as APOE4 carriers progress more rapidly than non-carriers in Alzheimer's disease [1].
Moreover, the companies' data showed that anti-amyloid antibody drugs had almost no impact on non-carriers, who have very little amyloid in their brains. This raises questions about the cost-effectiveness of these drugs, given their high annual list prices of $26,500 for Leqembi and $32,000 for Kisunla [1].
The findings have sparked debate about the potential benefits and limitations of anti-amyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease. While the drugs may have a minimally clinically significant reduction in disease progression for APOE4 carriers, the risks and costs associated with these treatments are a concern. The debate highlights the need for more robust clinical trials and real-world data to better understand the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these drugs.
References:
[1] https://seekingalpha.com/article/4810476-eli-lilly-biogen-eisai-muddying-alzheimers-disease-expensive-drugs-little-benefit
[2] https://www.precisionmedicineonline.com/business-news/eli-lilly-eisai-share-data-differing-treatment-duration-strategies-pricey-alzheimers

Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios