Dupixent outperforms Xolair in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma.
PorAinvest
domingo, 15 de junio de 2025, 11:26 am ET1 min de lectura
ILS--
Paris and Tarrytown, NY, June 15, 2025 - Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. presented compelling results from the EVEREST phase 4 study, demonstrating that Dupixent (dupilumab) outperformed Xolair (omalizumab) in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and coexistent asthma. The study, presented at the 2025 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Annual Congress in Glasgow, UK, highlighted Dupixent's efficacy in both upper and lower respiratory diseases by targeting IL-4 and IL-13, two key drivers of type 2 inflammation.
The EVEREST study, a randomized, double-blind phase 4 trial, compared the efficacy and safety of Dupixent and Xolair in adults with severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP and coexistent asthma. Dupixent 300 mg was administered every two weeks, while Xolair was dosed based on body weight and serum total IgE levels, every two or four weeks. Both treatments were added to background mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS).
Key findings from the study include:
- Primary and Secondary Endpoints: Dupixent outperformed Xolair across all primary and secondary endpoints for CRSwNP, including a 1.60-point superior reduction in nasal polyp size and an 8.0-point superior improvement in the ability to identify different smells. Dupixent also demonstrated a 0.58-point superior reduction in nasal congestion/obstruction and a 0.81-point superior improvement in loss of smell.
- Asthma Endpoints: Dupixent showed a 150 mL difference in lung function (pre-bronchodilator FEV1) and a 0.48-point difference in asthma control compared to Xolair.
- Safety Profile: The safety results were generally consistent with the known safety profile of Dupixent, with similar overall rates of adverse events (AEs) observed between Dupixent (64%) and Xolair (67%). Serious AEs were reported in 2% and 4% of patients treated with Dupixent and Xolair, respectively.
These results reinforce Dupixent's efficacy in targeting IL-4 and IL-13, which are central drivers of type 2 inflammation in multiple related and often co-morbid diseases. The study provides important insights that will guide patients and physicians through treatment decision-making processes.
References:
[1] https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/06/15/3099494/0/en/Press-Release-EAACI-Dupixent-demonstrated-superiority-over-Xolair-omalizumab-in-chronic-rhinosinusitis-with-nasal-polyps-in-patients-with-coexistent-asthma-in-first-ever-presented-.html
REGN--
SRM--
Dupixent (dupilumab) demonstrated superiority over Xolair (omalizumab) in a phase 4 head-to-head study for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and coexisting asthma. Dupixent outperformed Xolair across all primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for CRSwNP and asthma, including improvements in nasal polyp size, sense of smell, lung function, and disease control. The results reinforce Dupixent's efficacy in targeting IL-4 and IL-13, key drivers of type 2 inflammation in both upper and lower respiratory diseases.
Title: Dupixent Demonstrates Superiority Over Xolair in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Coexistent AsthmaParis and Tarrytown, NY, June 15, 2025 - Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. presented compelling results from the EVEREST phase 4 study, demonstrating that Dupixent (dupilumab) outperformed Xolair (omalizumab) in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and coexistent asthma. The study, presented at the 2025 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Annual Congress in Glasgow, UK, highlighted Dupixent's efficacy in both upper and lower respiratory diseases by targeting IL-4 and IL-13, two key drivers of type 2 inflammation.
The EVEREST study, a randomized, double-blind phase 4 trial, compared the efficacy and safety of Dupixent and Xolair in adults with severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP and coexistent asthma. Dupixent 300 mg was administered every two weeks, while Xolair was dosed based on body weight and serum total IgE levels, every two or four weeks. Both treatments were added to background mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS).
Key findings from the study include:
- Primary and Secondary Endpoints: Dupixent outperformed Xolair across all primary and secondary endpoints for CRSwNP, including a 1.60-point superior reduction in nasal polyp size and an 8.0-point superior improvement in the ability to identify different smells. Dupixent also demonstrated a 0.58-point superior reduction in nasal congestion/obstruction and a 0.81-point superior improvement in loss of smell.
- Asthma Endpoints: Dupixent showed a 150 mL difference in lung function (pre-bronchodilator FEV1) and a 0.48-point difference in asthma control compared to Xolair.
- Safety Profile: The safety results were generally consistent with the known safety profile of Dupixent, with similar overall rates of adverse events (AEs) observed between Dupixent (64%) and Xolair (67%). Serious AEs were reported in 2% and 4% of patients treated with Dupixent and Xolair, respectively.
These results reinforce Dupixent's efficacy in targeting IL-4 and IL-13, which are central drivers of type 2 inflammation in multiple related and often co-morbid diseases. The study provides important insights that will guide patients and physicians through treatment decision-making processes.
References:
[1] https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/06/15/3099494/0/en/Press-Release-EAACI-Dupixent-demonstrated-superiority-over-Xolair-omalizumab-in-chronic-rhinosinusitis-with-nasal-polyps-in-patients-with-coexistent-asthma-in-first-ever-presented-.html
Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios