Darden's Q1 2026: Contradictions Emerge on Pricing Strategy, Delivery & Marketing, and Consumer Spending and Income Groups
Generado por agente de IAAinvest Earnings Call Digest
jueves, 18 de septiembre de 2025, 12:15 pm ET4 min de lectura
DRI--
The above is the analysis of the conflicting points in this earnings call
Date of Call: None provided
Financials Results
- Revenue: $3.0B, up 10% YOY
- EPS: $1.97 adjusted diluted EPS from continuing operations, up 12.6% YOY
Guidance:
- FY26 total sales growth expected at 7.5%–8.5% (raised)
- Same-restaurant sales growth 2.5%–3.5% (tightened)
- Approximately 65 new restaurant openings (pipeline accelerated)
- Total inflation 3.0%–3.5%; commodities inflation 3%–4%
- Adjusted diluted EPS unchanged at $10.50–$10.70; lowest YoY EPS growth in Q2
- Q2 pricing ~100 bps below inflation; gapGAP-- narrows in H2
- Commodity inflation expected to peak in Q2; beef costs elevated; coverage lighter (≈25% in beef next 6 months)
- Pricing for FY to end in mid-to-high 2%, continuing to price below total inflation
Business Commentary:
- Strong Financial Performance:
- Darden Restaurants reported
sales growthof4.7%for Q1, exceeding expectations, with total sales reaching$2.8 billion. - The company's
adjusted diluted net earnings per sharewere$1.97, up12.6%from the previous year. This growth was driven by their strategic investments in pricing, menu innovation, and consumer engagement, as well as positive same restaurant sales and traffic growth in most segments.
UberDirect Partnership Success:
- Olive Garden and Cheddar’s Scratch Kitchen saw significant growth through their partnership with UberDirect for delivery, with delivery order volume doubling during a promotional campaign.
- Following the promotion, delivery order volume remained
40%above pre-campaign averages, contributing to increased sales and traffic. The partnership helped capture younger and more affluent guests, resulting in higher check averages and incremental opportunities for these brands.
Menu Pricing and Affordability:
- Darden maintained pricing below total inflation, with
food and beverage expenseslower by20 basis points, driven by leverage on pricing. - The company continued to emphasize affordability, introducing smaller portion sizes at Olive Garden, which increased preference scores by
15%. These initiatives catered to evolving consumer tastes for bolder flavors and allowed for price adjustments to respond to market demands.
Beef Cost Challenges and Strategic Pricing:
- The company faced challenges with higher beef costs, particularly impacting LongHorn Steakhouse with higher-than-expected costs towards the end of the quarter.
- Darden’s pricing was
30 basis pointsbelow inflation for the first quarter, with a plan for further adjustments as the year progresses. - The strategy aims to navigate inflationary pressures while ensuring long-term business health and consumer value, with a focus on maintaining strategic pricing rather than short-term adjustments.
Sentiment Analysis:
- Management said results “exceeded our expectations,” with “same restaurant sales and earnings growth” strong. Guidance was raised for total sales growth and same-restaurant sales, and development accelerated (~65 openings). They highlighted strong Olive Garden and LongHorn comps and continued market-share gains. Caution noted on elevated beef costs and Q2 EPS growth being the lowest of the year, but they reiterated full-year EPS guidance and expect the price/inflation gap to narrow in H2.
Q&A:
- Question from Brian James Harbour (Morgan Stanley): Could you discuss contracting/coverage on food costs, especially beef, and visibility for the rest of the year?
Response: Beef coverage is ~25% for the next six months; beef and shrimp (tariffs) drive higher inflation; current beef spikes seem unsustainable; raised commodity inflation to 3%–4% with situation fluid.
- Question from Brian James Harbour (Morgan Stanley): Early read on Olive Garden’s smaller portions—traffic or check impact?
Response: Early but viewed as a traffic driver; modest check dilution as some trade down; signs of slightly higher frequency without marketing support yet.
- Question from John Tower (Citi): How did affordability initiatives and UberDirect affect margins, and what’s the forward impact?
Response: Planned and absorbed: Olive Garden pricing was 1.9%; Uber fees and affordability each ~20 bps margin headwind; OG segment margin only -10 bps YOY and still >20%.
- Question from John Tower (Citi): Any color on delivery guests’ frequency/seasonality at Olive Garden?
Response: Delivery guests are more frequent than dine-in; no typical summer drop-off seen; still building read on seasonality as the channel scales.
- Question from David Palmer (Evercore ISI): What’s driving casual dining strength, and how will Olive Garden sustain momentum against tougher compares?
Response: Value leadership with lower pricing vs other segments and strong in-restaurant experience; Olive Garden has back-half plans, with right-sized portions supporting long-term traffic.
- Question from Jim Sanderson (Stephens): LongHorn comp split (traffic vs ticket) and pricing vs inflation cadence?
Response: LongHorn traffic +3.2%, check +2.3% (price 2.5%, -20 bps mix); Darden pricing ~100 bps below inflation in Q2, gap narrows in H2 while staying below inflation for FY.
- Question from Eric Andrew Gonzalez (KeyBanc Capital Markets): Trends by income cohort and margin outlook amid commodities?
Response: Visits up across all income groups, notably higher-income; focus is on EAT margin flat-to-up per long-term framework, even if segment margins fluctuate.
- Question from David Tarantino (Baird): State of the consumer and driver of narrowing price/inflation gap later in year?
Response: Consumer steady vs start of year; narrowing gap mainly from taking a bit more price later while avoiding pricing for temporary cost spikes.
- Question from Sarah Senator (Bank of America): How are you investing behind top-line (marketing, delivery fees)?
Response: Increasing media (more TRPs, CTV/digital) without deep discounting; free-delivery campaign modestly pressured margins; will continue targeted delivery promotions.
- Question from Jeffrey Bernstein (Barclays): Confidence in raised comp guide and Q2; UberUBER-- first-party expansion and marketplace view?
Response: Raised outlook reflects strong unit pipeline and start to Q2; back-half comps remain lower than first half; a third brand adds first-party delivery in Q3; remain cautious on third-party marketplaces.
- Question from Jacob Aiken-Phillips (Milieus Research): Unit growth ramp and prototype/cost updates?
Response: Target 3%–4% sales growth from new units over five years; smaller, more efficient prototypes lower costs; construction tracking at/under budget with strong returns.
- Question from Jake Bartlett (Truist Securities): Delivery mix and Never Ending Pasta Bowl performance at Olive Garden?
Response: Delivery ~5% in Q1; exited ~4% (still ~40% above pre-promo); will use Uber marketing funds; Never Ending Pasta Bowl off to a strong start with higher preference/refills, within guidance.
- Question from Peter Saleh (BTIG): What’s driving beef price spikes and how would you respond if sustained?
Response: Supply constraints (packer cutbacks, halted Mexico imports, Brazil tariffs) and near-term demand; expect demand destruction; would consider more price if high costs persist and demand supports it.
- Question from John Ivanko (J.P. Morgan): Retail beef demand and smaller-portion strategy lessons?
Response: Recent retail beef volume turned to low-single-digit decline YOY; OG’s smaller portions remain abundant with unlimited soup/salad/breadsticks, adding price breadth without shrinking the whole menu.
- Question from Lauren Silverman (Deutsche Bank): Comp cadence and commodity cadence by quarter/region?
Response: July was weakest; August had biggest gap vs industry; limited regional variance; commodity inflation expected to peak in Q2, remain >3% in Q3, easing by Q4.
- Question from Courtney Aquilla (Bernstein): Progress on speed of service and drivers of top/bottom store performance within brands?
Response: Speed gains early; renewed focus via GMGM-- conference; store outperformance primarily driven by strong, stable restaurant leadership teams.
- Question from Dennis Geiger (UBS): Any notable daypart or menu-mix behaviors?
Response: Alcohol preference is softer; LongHorn lunch growing faster than dinner (both up); fine dining weekdays softer on reduced business travel.
- Question from Christopher Thomas O’Cull (Stifel): Risk from eliminating the tip wage?
Response: Models vary across the industry; Darden can adapt to policy outcomes and does not foresee material impact to its business model.
- Question from Brian Michael Vaccaro (Raymond James): Olive Garden comp breakdown and check vs price; labor reinvestment?
Response: Olive Garden: SSS +5.9% with traffic +2.8% plus +80 bps catering; price 1.9% and ~40 bps delivery fee uplift; check will exceed price mainly due to delivery fees; labor inflation 3.1% offset by productivity.
- Question from Jim Sanderson (North Coast Research): Delivery incrementality and Olive Garden mix impact from smaller portions?
Response: Delivery ~50% incremental outside promos; smaller portions are mix-dilutive but offset by higher-preference premium items like Calabrian steak & shrimp.
- Question from Zach Ogden for Andrew Michael Charles (TD Cowen): Which brands are driving ‘other business’ and any Gen Z trends?
Response: Cheddar’s led comps, followed by Yard House and Seasons 52; Gen Z behavior broadly similar to overall consumer trends.
Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios