El proyecto de ley sobre la estructura del mercado criptográfico en los Estados Unidos: un punto de inflexión estratégico para la entrada de instituciones y el liderazgo en materia de innovación.

The U.S. Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act) represents a seismic shift in the regulatory landscape for digital assets. By resolving jurisdictional ambiguities between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the bill creates a clear framework for institutional participation, positioning the U.S. as a global leader in digital asset innovation. This analysis evaluates how the CLARITY Act unlocks institutional capital inflows and reinforces U.S. dominance in the digital asset space, while contextualizing its implications against international regulatory trends.

Regulatory Clarity as a Catalyst for Institutional Capital

The CLARITY Act's core innovation lies in its classification of digital assets into three categories: digital commodities, investment contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins according to the bill text. By granting the CFTC exclusive oversight of spot markets for digital commodities and reserving the SEC's authority for investment contracts, the bill eliminates the regulatory "turf war" that has stifled innovation and deterred institutional investors as detailed in a legal analysis. This delineation reduces legal uncertainty, enabling institutions to allocate capital with confidence.

For instance, the Act's provisions on stablecoins-complemented by the GENIUS Act's reserve requirements-have already spurred institutional adoption. As of late 2025, U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs hold over 800,000 BTC, with BlackRock's IBIT briefly reaching $100 billion in assets under management. Pension funds and state governments are now directly allocating to digital assets, supported by the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) and a Digital Asset Stockpile, signaling a shift from speculative trading to strategic, long-term investment.

Global Competitiveness: U.S. vs. EU and Beyond

The CLARITY Act's impact is amplified by its alignment with global regulatory trends while distinguishing the U.S. as a more innovation-friendly jurisdiction. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, effective since 2025, created a harmonized framework but faces implementation challenges according to Chainalysis analysis. In contrast, the U.S. approach-centered on clear jurisdictional boundaries and federal oversight-offers a more predictable environment for institutional players.

For example, the U.S. has attracted hedge funds and traditional asset managers at an accelerating rate. A 2025 survey by AIMA and PwC found that 55% of traditional hedge funds now have exposure to digital assets, up from 47% in 2024. This growth is driven by tokenized structures and blockchain-enabled liquidity solutions, which are gaining traction in markets like Germany under MiCA but face slower adoption in the EU due to fragmented enforcement.

Meanwhile, jurisdictions like Singapore and Japan are also advancing digital asset frameworks, but the U.S. maintains an edge through its dual focus on market structure and consumer protection. The CLARITY Act's requirement for CFTC-registered exchanges and custodians ensures institutional-grade safeguards, while the Senate's Responsible Financial Innovation Act-building on CLARITY- adds investor protections and disclosure requirements for ancillary assets.

The Road Ahead: Implementation and Global Influence

While the CLARITY Act has passed the House, its Senate counterpart-the Responsible Financial Innovation Act- introduces nuances, such as the SEC's primary role in regulating ancillary assets. These differences highlight the need for coordination, but the bill's core principles are likely to endure. Key deadlines, including July 18, 2026, for regulations under the GENIUS Act, will further solidify the U.S. framework.

Globally, the U.S. model is influencing regulatory convergence. The Financial Stability Board (FSB) and Financial Action Task Force (FATF) have prioritized stablecoin oversight, aligning with the U.S. and EU's focus on cross-border payments and anti-money laundering (AML) measures. As other jurisdictions adopt similar frameworks, the U.S. risks losing its edge if implementation lags. However, the Senate's planned hearings in January 2026 and the CFTC/SEC's rulemaking timelines suggest a rapid rollout.

Conclusion: A New Era for Digital Assets

The CLARITY Act is not merely a regulatory fix-it is a strategic inflection point. By clarifying roles, attracting institutional capital, and fostering innovation, the U.S. is redefining the digital asset landscape. While global competitors like the EU and Singapore are closing the gap, the U.S. remains the most attractive jurisdiction for institutional players seeking a stable, transparent, and scalable market. As 2026 unfolds, the real work of implementation will determine whether the U.S. cements its leadership or faces challenges from emerging hubs. For now, the CLARITY Act has laid the groundwork for a future where digital assets are no longer a niche but a cornerstone of global finance.