"Crypto Firms in Crosshairs: Biden's 'Chokepoint' Sparks Political Firestorm"

Generado por agente de IACoin World
domingo, 9 de febrero de 2025, 10:03 am ET1 min de lectura
COIN--
FISI--
MARA--
NKE--
WMB--

The recent Congressional hearings on Operation Chokepoint 2.0, an alleged initiative by the former US President Joe Biden's administration to "de-bank" crypto firms, revealed deep political divisions in the United States. The hearings, titled "Operation Choke Point 2.0: The Biden administration’s Efforts to Put Crypto in the Crosshairs," saw members of the Republican and Democratic parties presenting contrasting views on the alleged regulatory overreach.

Republicans asserted that the Biden administration had pressured US financial institutions to deny bank accounts to cryptocurrency firms, while Democrats dismissed the allegations, claiming that Operation Chokepoint 2.0 was a "fake program" never initiated by the Biden administration. Despite the political divide, both parties agreed on the need for steps to prevent future regulatory 'overreach'.

Witnesses, including Paul Grewal, chief legal officer at Coinbase, and Fred Thiel, CEO of MARA Holdings, testified about the alleged pressure exerted by regulators on banks to deny stablecoin issuers and crypto companies access to banking services. Grewal described the regulators' actions as "bullying," while Thiel recounted his company's struggles to maintain banking services.

However, Democratic representatives, such as Al Green and Nikema Williams, questioned the existence of Operation Chokepoint 2.0 and criticized the focus on crypto policy, arguing that more pressing issues, like the racial wealth gap, deserved attention. They also raised concerns about the former president's lack of influence in the current administration.

Legal experts, such as Dru Stevenson and Stephen Gannon, offered differing opinions on the seriousness of the alleged debanking of the crypto industry. Stevenson dismissed the allegations as "rhetorical red meat" for the GOP base, while Gannon argued that the evidence showed regulators had overreached in the previous administration.

Despite the disagreements, both parties found common ground in their support for reforms to prevent future regulatory overreach. Witnesses, including Austin Campbell and Shayna Oleszek, suggested reforms such as written guidance, public disclosure of regulatory actions, and independent oversight of banking regulators.

The hearings highlighted the need for clear, transparent, and objective regulatory guidance to prevent the abuse of power and protect both banks and crypto firms from arbitrary decisions. As the crypto industry continues to grow, it is essential for regulators to strike a balance between protecting consumers and fostering

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios