Comer: We're not accusing Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing

Comer: We're not accusing Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing

House Oversight Committee Advances Contempt Measures Against Clintons Amid Epstein Inquiry

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has moved to hold former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for defying bipartisan subpoenas related to the committee's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's ties to prominent political figures. While Comer emphasized that the measure does not accuse Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing, he stated the committee is committed to enforcing legal compliance with congressional oversight.

The Clintons rejected the subpoenas, asserting they are "invalid and legally unenforceable" and warning that Comer's actions are politically motivated. In a joint letter, they framed their refusal as a principled stand to "fight for this country's principles," despite bipartisan legal consensus that congressional subpoenas are enforceable. Comer dismissed their claims, noting the couple's refusal to testify "makes them look guiltier" and undermines institutional accountability.

Legal experts, including former U.S. Attorney John Fishwick and Georgetown Law professor David Rapallo, have supported the committee's position, stating that Congress has broad authority to compel testimony and that the Clintons' defiance sets a dangerous precedent. The contempt resolutions, which advanced with bipartisan support, could lead to criminal referrals to the Department of Justice.

While Hillary Clinton began testifying in closed-door depositions on February 26, 2026, in New York, the controversy underscores broader debates about the limits of executive power and congressional investigative authority. Comer's inquiry has shifted focus from prior presidential administrations' handling of Epstein files to scrutinizing relationships between lawmakers and the financier, with Democrats now prioritizing transparency over party loyalty.

The outcome of the contempt process remains uncertain, but the case has reignited discussions about accountability in high-profile political figures. As one legal analyst noted, "No one is above the law," a principle central to the committee's argument. Investors and observers may monitor potential legal repercussions, including fines or prosecutions, which could further strain the Clintons' public standing and political legacy.