Colombia's Airstrikes: Government Defense vs. Child Protection Calls

Colombia's government faces mounting pressure to halt military strikes against rebel groups after human rights officials confirmed at least 12 minors were killed in airstrikes this year. The human rights ombudswoman, Iris Marín, called on President Gustavo Petro to suspend operations where children might be present, citing heart-wrenching cases of teenagers forcibly recruited by armed groups and killed in recent attacks. The incidents have reignited debates over the ethical use of military force in conflict zones and the government's responsibility to protect civilian lives.

The latest casualties occurred in Arauca and Guaviare provinces, where the military has targeted the FARC-EMC rebel group and its leader, Iván Mordisco. Marín's office revealed that one female teenager was killed in a strike last week, while four others-recruited by the rebels-were killed in October. A separate attack in Guaviare claimed the lives of seven more minors, prompting an inquiry into whether the operation violated international law. The United Nations human rights office in Colombia condemned the recruitment of children as a war crime and urged the government to take "all measures necessary" to prevent such deaths.

President Petro has defended the airstrikes, arguing they are essential to protect soldiers and civilians from rebel attacks. He accused criminal groups of using children as human shields and warned that suspending strikes would embolden rebel leaders to recruit more minors. Petro also announced plans to denounce Mordisco at the International Criminal Court for child recruitment. However, critics point to a 2019 scandal in which a former defense minister resigned after the government was found to have covered up the deaths of eight children in an airstrike. This history has fueled skepticism about Petro's claims that his administration is transparent about civilian casualties.

The conflict has intensified as the government struggles to contain rebel expansion in regions vacated by the FARC, which reached a peace deal with the state in 2016. Petro initially suspended airstrikes in 2021 to reduce child deaths but resumed them last year amid rising violence. The administration frames the attacks as a necessary measure to counter armed groups that threaten public safety, but rights groups argue the strategy risks repeating past atrocities.

Internationally, the situation has drawn comparisons to U.S. drone strikes in the Caribbean, which Petro has criticized as "extrajudicial executions." However, he insists Colombia's approach is distinct because rebels in the strikes are armed and actively threaten civilians according to reports. The debate underscores broader tensions between security imperatives and human rights protections in asymmetric conflicts.

As the inquiry into the Guaviare airstrike unfolds, the international community remains divided. While some support Petro's hardline stance against rebels, others demand stricter adherence to humanitarian principles. For now, the government maintains its position that military action is vital to stabilizing the region, even as the tragic toll on children continues to draw condemnation.

---