La reducción de precios de la COAI y el cálculo de las acciones pequeñas de IA: un análisis de la sensibilidad del mercado de 2025

The collapse of ChainOpera AI (COAI) in late 2025 marked a pivotal moment for the small-cap AI sector, exposing deep-seated vulnerabilities in speculative crypto assets and triggering a sector-wide reassessment of risk. The COAI index, which tracks AI-focused crypto assets, plummeted nearly 90% from $44.90 to $2.18 by October 20, driven by a confluence of internal governance failures, regulatory ambiguity, and extreme token concentration. This downturn not only eroded investor confidence but also forced a broader reevaluation of risk in small-cap AI stocks, as market participants grappled with the implications of a sector increasingly defined by volatility and uncertainty.

Internal and External Catalysts for the COAI Collapse

The COAI crash was catalyzed by a series of internal and external shocks. At the core was C3 AI's Q1 2025 net loss of $116.8 million, compounded by a class-action lawsuit and the abrupt resignation of CEO Thomas Siebel. These events exposed the fragility of speculative AI crypto assets, particularly those reliant on centralized governance structures. Externally, regulatory uncertainty played a critical role. The U.S. CLARITY Act and EU AI Act failed to provide clear guidelines on whether AI-related tokens should be classified as securities, deterring institutional investment and exacerbating liquidity challenges.

Compounding these issues was the extreme concentration of COAI's token supply, with 97% controlled by the top ten wallets. This raised red flags about potential manipulation and liquidity risks, accelerating panic selling. The collapse of algorithmic stablecoins like xUSD and deUSD in late 2025 further destabilized the market, triggering a broader liquidity crisis.

Sector-Wide Implications for Small-Cap AI Stocks

The COAI downturn reverberated across the small-cap AI sector, amplifying existing risks and reshaping investor behavior. SoundHound AI (SOUN), for instance, saw its stock plummet 41% in 2025, driven by slowing revenue growth, ongoing losses, and macroeconomic headwinds. While the company reported 68% year-over-year revenue growth in Q3 2025, the broader market's flight from speculative AI assets overshadowed such fundamentals. Similarly, companies like BILL Holdings and SoundHound AI faced heightened scrutiny over their exposure to regulatory shifts and market volatility.

The sector's volatility was starkly quantified in late 2025, with AI-related tokens exhibiting 90-day volatility averages of 85%, far exceeding Bitcoin's 60% and Ethereum's 70%. This prompted investors to adopt more cautious strategies, including options-based hedging and blockchain verification tools to mitigate risks.

Investor Behavior and Risk Reassessment

The COAI collapse catalyzed a significant shift in investor sentiment. Institutional capital began reallocating to more stable sectors like cybersecurity and AI infrastructure. Retail investors, however, remained cautiously optimistic, with some analysts suggesting the COAI drop represented an overcorrection. Technical indicators, such as the RSI and MFI, confirmed a bearish phase for COAI, with a critical resistance level at $22.44.

Regulatory developments further shaped this reassessment. The U.S. GENIUS Act and EU's MiCA regime introduced stricter oversight, compelling CIOs and asset managers to refine due diligence processes and monitor regulatory signals in real time. These changes underscored a growing emphasis on transparency and compliance, particularly in markets where token concentration and governance failures had previously gone unchecked.

Future Outlook and Lessons Learned

Despite the turmoil, some analysts argue that the COAI crash may ultimately strengthen the AI sector by weeding out speculative assets and encouraging fundamentals-driven innovation. C3 AI's strong revenue growth and potential regulatory clarity in 2026 are cited as long-term positives. However, the road to recovery remains fraught with challenges, including macroeconomic pressures and the need for consistent global standards to prevent regulatory arbitrage.

For investors, the COAI collapse serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of overconcentration and the importance of diversification. As the sector evolves, the ability to balance innovation with risk management will be critical to navigating the volatile landscape of small-cap AI stocks.