Cevian Capital Urges UBS to Relocate Amid Swiss Capital Plans
PorAinvest
jueves, 18 de septiembre de 2025, 1:05 am ET2 min de lectura
UBS--
Activist investor Cevian Capital, which holds a 1.4% stake in UBS, has urged the bank to relocate due to the proposed capital hike. Cevian's co-founder Lars Förberg stated that it is no longer feasible to run a large international bank from Switzerland under the current proposals. UBS has held preliminary discussions with U.S. officials to explore a potential headquarters move, which could involve acquiring or merging with a mid-sized U.S. bank to strengthen its presence [2].
The Swiss government's proposal aims to strengthen the stability of the Swiss banking system and reduce the likelihood of another crisis similar to Credit Suisse. However, UBS has criticized the proposals, arguing that they could undermine competitiveness without enhancing stability. The bank has stressed that while it intends to remain a global bank headquartered in Switzerland, it is exploring ways to safeguard shareholder and stakeholder interests if the rules proceed as drafted [1].
UBS has been steadily integrating Credit Suisse, having already merged 95 Swiss branches and achieved $9.1 billion in cost savings since the end of 2022. This represents about 70% of its ambitious $13 billion target set for completion by 2026. While legacy legal costs from Credit Suisse remain a drag, UBS is firmly on track to complete the integration by 2026, reinforcing its wealth management dominance and strengthening its capital position [1].
The political climate in Switzerland has added to the strain. Finance minister Karin Keller-Sutter has insisted it was "not up to the Federal Council to determine the location of UBS’s head office" and noted that such threats were not new. The Swiss People's Party has voiced opposition to significantly higher capital demands, leaving the outcome uncertain as parliament begins its debates [2].
The consequences for Switzerland should UBS leave would be far-reaching. Tax revenues for the federal government, cantons, and municipalities would shrink. Thousands of highly paid jobs in Zurich could disappear. Smaller businesses, which rely on UBS for credit, might also struggle to secure financing. Observers have warned that the reputational damage would be "immense" [2].
UBS has started lobbying while parliament prepares to debate the law. The legislative process could take years, giving the bank time to press its case [2].
The potential relocation of UBS's headquarters to the U.S. highlights the bank's adaptability and could provide greater opportunities for growth through deals and acquisitions in the robust U.S. financial market. However, such a move would entail complex logistical and legal hurdles. Analysts point to the need for restructuring holding companies, as UBS outlined in past mergers, including plans for a single U.S. intermediate entity post-Credit Suisse acquisition [3].
Activist investor Cevian Capital, which holds a 1.4% stake in UBS, is urging the bank to relocate from Switzerland due to stricter capital requirements proposed by the Swiss government. Cevian's co-founder Lars Förberg says it is no longer possible to run a large international bank from Switzerland under the current proposals. UBS is considering relocating its headquarters to an overseas location if the Swiss government insists on the capital hike.
UBS Group AG is reportedly considering relocating its headquarters from Switzerland to the United States in response to proposed stricter capital requirements by the Swiss government. This potential move, first reported by the New York Post, underscores the bank's efforts to navigate regulatory pressures and maintain its competitive edge. The proposal follows Switzerland's Federal Department of Finance's June 2025 announcement that UBS should fully capitalize its foreign subsidiaries, up from the current 60% threshold. This move is expected to increase UBS’s common equity tier-one capital by up to $26 billion [1].Activist investor Cevian Capital, which holds a 1.4% stake in UBS, has urged the bank to relocate due to the proposed capital hike. Cevian's co-founder Lars Förberg stated that it is no longer feasible to run a large international bank from Switzerland under the current proposals. UBS has held preliminary discussions with U.S. officials to explore a potential headquarters move, which could involve acquiring or merging with a mid-sized U.S. bank to strengthen its presence [2].
The Swiss government's proposal aims to strengthen the stability of the Swiss banking system and reduce the likelihood of another crisis similar to Credit Suisse. However, UBS has criticized the proposals, arguing that they could undermine competitiveness without enhancing stability. The bank has stressed that while it intends to remain a global bank headquartered in Switzerland, it is exploring ways to safeguard shareholder and stakeholder interests if the rules proceed as drafted [1].
UBS has been steadily integrating Credit Suisse, having already merged 95 Swiss branches and achieved $9.1 billion in cost savings since the end of 2022. This represents about 70% of its ambitious $13 billion target set for completion by 2026. While legacy legal costs from Credit Suisse remain a drag, UBS is firmly on track to complete the integration by 2026, reinforcing its wealth management dominance and strengthening its capital position [1].
The political climate in Switzerland has added to the strain. Finance minister Karin Keller-Sutter has insisted it was "not up to the Federal Council to determine the location of UBS’s head office" and noted that such threats were not new. The Swiss People's Party has voiced opposition to significantly higher capital demands, leaving the outcome uncertain as parliament begins its debates [2].
The consequences for Switzerland should UBS leave would be far-reaching. Tax revenues for the federal government, cantons, and municipalities would shrink. Thousands of highly paid jobs in Zurich could disappear. Smaller businesses, which rely on UBS for credit, might also struggle to secure financing. Observers have warned that the reputational damage would be "immense" [2].
UBS has started lobbying while parliament prepares to debate the law. The legislative process could take years, giving the bank time to press its case [2].
The potential relocation of UBS's headquarters to the U.S. highlights the bank's adaptability and could provide greater opportunities for growth through deals and acquisitions in the robust U.S. financial market. However, such a move would entail complex logistical and legal hurdles. Analysts point to the need for restructuring holding companies, as UBS outlined in past mergers, including plans for a single U.S. intermediate entity post-Credit Suisse acquisition [3].

Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios