Celestica Plunges 1.62 as $520M Volume Dumps It to 191st in Trading Activity

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Volume Radar
viernes, 12 de septiembre de 2025, 8:52 pm ET1 min de lectura
CLS--

Celestica (CLS) closed on Sept. 12, 2025, , marking its lowest price in over a month. , , . The reduced liquidity ranked it 191st in terms of trading activity among listed equities on the day.

Recent developments highlight shifting investor sentiment toward Celestica’s near-term outlook. A strategic update from the company earlier this week outlined plans to streamline operations in underperforming manufacturing hubs, . Meanwhile, supply chain disruptions in Asia—specifically delayed component deliveries from key suppliers—have raised concerns about potential production bottlenecks in Q4. These factors collectively contributed to the sell-off, as traders priced in near-term execution risks.

Technical indicators suggest short-term pressure remains intact. . , reflecting heightened bearish positioning. However, , .

To run a formal back-test we need to translate your idea (“buy the 500 most-actively-traded stocks each day, hold one day”) into something the platform’s engines can execute. A couple of key points need clarification: 1. UniverseUPC-- • Do you want all U.S. listed common stocks (NYSE / NASDAQ / AMEX) or a different universe (e.g., only S&P 500 constituents)? 2. Trade mechanicsMCHB-- • Entry price: buy at the same-day close, or at the next-day open after we know the ranking? • Exit price: sell next-day close (i.e., one full trading day), or something else? 3. Frictional costs • Should we assume zero commission/slippage, or do you have cost assumptions? Just as important: the current back-testing engine exposed in this chat is designed for single-ticker strategies or event-based tests. A daily re-balanced 500-stock portfolio is technically possible, but it requires a different multi-asset engine that isn’t yet wired into this interface. I can: A. Walk you through a high-level, approximate performance calculation (outside the toolset), or B. Help you reformulate the test into something the engine supports (e.g., event test on a single ETF or on individual tickers), or C. Queue this as a multi-asset portfolio test for an offline run (takes longer but produces full portfolio metrics). Let me know which pathPATH-- (and the trade details above) fits your needs best, and we’ll proceed accordingly.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios