Celestica's 0.31% Drop and $430M Volume Place It 275th in Market Activity Amid Sector Pressures

On October 2, 2025, Celestica (CLS) closed with a 0.31% decline, trading on $430 million in volume, ranking 275th in market activity. The stock’s muted performance reflected broader sector pressures amid mixed investor sentiment toward contract manufacturing firms navigating evolving supply chain dynamics.

Recent developments highlight Celestica’s strategic position in the global electronics manufacturing landscape. The company has been consolidating its North American production footprint through targeted facility rationalizations, a move analysts suggest could streamline operational costs but may also raise short-term execution risks. Meanwhile, ongoing client diversification efforts, including expanded partnerships with hyperscale data center clients, underscore long-term growth potential amid AI-driven infrastructure demand.

Market participants remain cautious about near-term volatility, with technical indicators showing elevated short-term trading interest. The stock’s liquidity profile, however, remains robust, supported by consistent institutional activity and a diversified client base spanning automotive, industrial, and defense sectors. No material earnings or corporate announcements were reported to directly influence the recent price action.

To run a rigorous back-test I need to pin down a few details first: 1. Universe • Is your universe all primary-listed U.S. common stocks (≈ 4,000 names) or another market? • Should ETFs, ADRs, OTC listings, etc. be included or excluded? 2. Ranking frequency & signal price • Use each day’s total dollar volume (shares × close) calculated at the market close, then enter the positions at the next day’s open? • Or rank by number of shares traded and enter at the same-day close? 3. Portfolio construction • Equal-weight all 500 names each day, fully rebalancing every trading day? • Any transaction-cost or slippage assumptions you’d like applied? 4. Practical note on the toolset The automated back-test tools available in this workspace currently evaluate one ticker at a time. To implement a 500-stock daily-rotating portfolio I can: a) Script the ranking, weighting and P&L calculations externally and summarize the results here, or b) Approximate with an investable proxy (e.g., an ETF or index) if that meets your purpose. Please let me know your preferences and I’ll proceed with the most suitable workflow.