La incertidumbre en cuanto al impuesto a los incrementos de capital redefine la participación privada y las fusiones y adquisiciones en el Reino Unido: cronograma estratégico de salida y mitigación de riesgos en un paisaje en cambio

The UK's evolving capital gains tax (CGT) landscape, driven by Labour Party reforms, is catalyzing a seismic shift in private equity and M&A activity. As investors grapple with the implications of impending tax hikes and structural changes to carried interest, strategic exit timing and jurisdictional diversification have become critical priorities. From accelerated deal completions to declining AIM listings and capital flight to alternative jurisdictions, the market is recalibrating to mitigate risk and preserve wealth.

Accelerated M&A Completions: A Pre-2025 Rush to Beat Tax Hikes

The Autumn Budget 2024 and subsequent reforms have triggered a surge in UK M&A activity ahead of April 2025, as sellers and buyers sought to finalize transactions before the implementation of higher CGT rates and Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR) adjustments. According to a report by Paul Weiss, UK public M&A deal value surged by 160% in 2024 compared to 2023, despite a 9% drop in deal volumes, as strategic and financial sponsors prioritized liquidity. This trend intensified in early 2025, with sellers accelerating exits to avoid the 32% CGT rate on carried interest, which took effect on 6 April 2025.

Data from RSM UK indicates that the threat of CGT increases prompted a wave of pre-budget completions, with 42 deals valued at over £5 million announced in September 2024 alone. However, the first half of 2025 saw a 15% decline in private M&A activity compared to the robust finish of 2024, as economic uncertainty and higher tax burdens tempered seller incentives. The valuation gap widened, with conservative pricing becoming the norm, particularly for companies with weaker fundamentals.

Declining AIM Listings: Tax Uncertainty and Investor Flight

The UK's Alternative Investment Market (AIM) is experiencing a prolonged slump, with stocks trading at 30% to 40% below their 10-year averages. This decline coincides with Labour's CGT reforms, which have eroded investor confidence in the UK's attractiveness as a listing hub. The FCA's 2024 modernization of UK Listing Rules (UKLRs) aimed to reverse this trend by simplifying regulations, but the shadow of tax uncertainty persists.

Investors are increasingly wary of AIM's viability, particularly as Labour's reduction of CGT relief for Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs) from 100% to 50% has diminished the appeal of tax-free exits. The combination of higher CGT rates and reduced reliefs has created a climate where capital is being withdrawn from AIM in favor of jurisdictions offering more favorable tax environments.

Capital Flight to Alternative Jurisdictions: Luxembourg, Jersey, and Beyond

As the UK transitions to taxing carried interest as income-subject to an effective rate of 34.075% from April 2026-investors are shifting capital to alternative jurisdictions. Luxembourg and Jersey/Guernsey have emerged as key beneficiaries. In Luxembourg, carried interest is taxed at a maximum effective rate of 11.45% under a dual regime, while Jersey and Guernsey offer a tax-neutral environment with no CGT on carried interest.

This migration is not merely speculative: JPMorgan Private Bank notes that jurisdictions with favorable tax regimes are attracting capital and talent as the UK's tax landscape becomes less competitive. The shift is particularly pronounced in private equity, where fund structuring and domicile choices are being re-evaluated to minimize exposure to UK tax changes.

Strategic Exit Timing and Risk Mitigation: A Call for Proactive Planning

For entrepreneurs and investors, the imperative to act is urgent. The Autumn Budget 2025 confirmed further CGT increases, including a rise in BADR to 18% in April 2026, which is expected to trigger another wave of pre-budget completions. Strategic exit timing-such as finalizing transactions before April 2025 or 2026-remains a key tool for tax optimization.

However, timing alone is insufficient. Investors must also diversify geographically. As Aztec Group highlights, jurisdictions like Luxembourg and Jersey provide not only tax advantages but also regulatory flexibility, making them attractive for fund structuring. Additionally, alternative structures such as continuation funds and secondary buyouts are gaining traction as tools to preserve value in a high-uncertainty environment.

Conclusion: Navigating a Fragmented Landscape

The UK's CGT reforms are reshaping private equity and M&A activity in profound ways. Accelerated deal completions, declining AIM listings, and capital flight to alternative jurisdictions underscore the urgency for investors to reassess their strategies. For those seeking to preserve wealth and optimize returns, proactive planning-leveraging favorable tax regimes and strategic exit timing-is no longer optional but essential. As the Autumn Statement 2025 looms, the window for action is narrowing.