¿Es Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) una compañía que ha sido malinterpretada, con una desvalorización del 57.5% en términos de valoración financiera?

Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) has long been a cornerstone of the biopharma sector, but its current valuation-trading at roughly half the intrinsic value suggested by discounted cash flow (DCF) models-has sparked debate among investors. With a projected 57.5% undervaluation relative to its estimated fair value of $117.66–$127.94 per share, the stock appears to trade at a steep discount to its fundamentals. This analysis explores whether BMY's operational streamlining, pipeline progress, and strategic U.S. investments justify this valuation gap, despite looming patent cliffs and regulatory headwinds.

Operational Streamlining: A Foundation for Efficiency

BMY's multi-year restructuring program, initiated in 2023, has been a cornerstone of its strategy to align costs with growth priorities. The program's scope expanded from an initial $1.5 billion in charges by 2025 to $2.5 billion by 2027, with $1.4 billion already incurred. These costs, driven by employee terminations, site exits, and operational efficiencies, are expected to yield annual savings of $2 billion by 2027. Such savings are critical for offsetting revenue declines from patent expirations and funding innovation.

The company's Growth Portfolio, which includes newer therapies like Cobenfy and Camzyos, has shown resilience, contributing $5.6 billion in revenue during Q1 2025-a 16% year-over-year increase. This growth underscores BMY's ability to transition from legacy products to newer, higher-margin offerings, a key factor in DCF models that emphasize long-term cash flow stability.

Strategic U.S. Investments: Securing Innovation and Supply Chains

BMY's $40 billion commitment to U.S. R&D, manufacturing, and technology over five years reflects a broader industry trend to insulate supply chains from global disruptions. This investment accelerates radiopharmaceutical production and integrates AI-driven innovation, positioning BMY to reduce costs and expedite drug development. By aligning manufacturing with R&D in the U.S., the company aims to mitigate risks from potential import tariffs and regulatory scrutiny.

These efforts are not merely defensive. They signal a proactive strategy to dominate therapeutic areas like oncology and hematology, where BMY's pipeline includes late-stage candidates such as milvexian (for cardiovascular conditions) and arlo-cel (for multiple myeloma). Analysts project milvexian could reach $6 billion in global sales by 2033, while arlo-cel's potential remains untapped but promising.

Patent Cliffs and Regulatory Challenges: Navigating the Storm

BMY faces a patent cliff as blockbuster drugs like Eliquis ($13.3 billion in 2024 sales) and Opdivo lose exclusivity in 2025–2026. These expirations threaten up to 50% of the company's revenue before 2030. However, BMY's cost-cutting initiatives-such as a $3.5 billion savings target through 2027 via layoffs and operational reorganization-are designed to cushion the blow.

Regulatory risks, including potential FDA crackdowns on direct-to-consumer advertising and staffing changes at the Department of Health and Human Services, could further complicate commercialization. Yet BMY's robust pipeline, with multiple compounds in clinical trials, provides a buffer. For instance, Opdivo Qvantig, the subcutaneous version of Opdivo, generated $67 million in Q3 2025 revenue, demonstrating the company's ability to extend product lifecycles through innovation.

DCF Valuation: A Case for Undervaluation

The crux of the undervaluation argument lies in DCF assumptions. Using a two-stage free cash flow to equity model, analysts project BMY's free cash flow to decline from $15.3 billion (trailing twelve months) to $11.1 billion by 2030. However, these projections incorporate conservative assumptions, such as a 9.41% discount rate and a terminal growth rate declining to -9.67%. Critics argue that these parameters understate the company's pipeline potential and operational efficiencies.

For example, BMY's strategic acquisitions-like Karuna Therapeutics for Cobenfy-add high-growth assets to its portfolio. Meanwhile, its $2 billion in additional cost savings through 2027 could bolster cash flow resilience. If milvexian and arlo-cel achieve their projected sales milestones, the terminal value in DCF models could be significantly higher, justifying the 57.5% undervaluation.

Conclusion: A Misunderstood Buy or a Risky Bet?

BMY's valuation discount reflects legitimate concerns about patent cliffs and regulatory uncertainty. However, its operational discipline, U.S. investment strategy, and pipeline depth suggest the market is underestimating its long-term potential. While the path to $127.94 per share is not without risks, the company's proactive approach to cost management and innovation positions it as a compelling value play for investors with a multi-year horizon.

For value investors, the key question is whether BMY's current P/E ratio of eight times projected 2026 earnings adequately accounts for its future cash flow potential. Given the company's track record of navigating challenges and its strategic investments, the answer may lean toward "yes"-making BMY a misunderstood buy in a sector often dominated by short-term pessimism.