Brenmiller Energy shares surge 50.97% premarket after expanding U.S. commercial pipeline to $210 million with Rock Energy Storage partnership.

think> Okay, let's tackle this query. The user wants me to act as a financial analyst explaining Brenmiller Energy's stock price movement based on recent news. The stock is up 50.97% in the premarket. I need to check the provided news events to see what caused this jump. First, looking at the stock performance: a huge increase of over 50% in premarket. That's a significant move, so there must be a major positive news event. Now, scanning through the recent news. The latest news is from January 17, 2025, but the stock price data is from that date, so the news up to that point is relevant. Looking through the news events, the most recent ones are from January 2025. The first one on January 17 mentions that Brenmiller Energy's stock was down 10.7%, but that's from a different source (americanbankingnews.com). However, the user's input says the stock is up, so maybe that's conflicting. Wait, the user's input says the stock is up 50.97% premarket, so perhaps that January 17 news is not the cause. Let me check the other news. The next news is from January 16: "Brenmiller Energy Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Minimum Closing Bid Price Rule." That's important because if a stock regains compliance, it avoids delisting, which is a positive development. However, this was on the 16th, and the stock movement is on the 17th premarket. So that could be a reason. But does regaining compliance typically cause such a large jump? Maybe, but 50% seems high for that alone. Looking further, the January 8 news from 2025 says they grew their U.S. commercial pipeline to over $210 million with Rock Energy Storage. That's a significant positive. Then on December 31, 2024, they completed component manufacturing for Tempo bGen and are on-track for 2025 commissioning. Also, on December 30, they were selected for a project in Spain by REBI. These are all positive developments indicating growth and project progress. But the stock movement is in the premarket on January 17, 2025. The most recent relevant news before that would be the January 16 compliance news. However, the user's input also includes a news article from January 17 at 3:07 AM about the stock dropping 10.7%, which seems conflicting. But since the user provided the stock is up, maybe that news is misleading or from a different time. Alternatively, perhaps the user's input has conflicting info. Wait, the user's input for the stock performance is a 50.97% increase in premarket, but the first news item on January 17 says the stock was down 10.7%. That's confusing. Maybe the user made a mistake, or perhaps the news is from a different source. Assuming the stock is indeed up 50.97% in premarket, the most plausible reason from the news is the January 16 compliance with Nasdaq's bid price rule. Regaining compliance would prevent delisting, which is a major positive. However, a 50% jump might be too high for that. Alternatively, maybe there's another news event. Let me check again. Looking at the news from January 17, there's no positive news listed except the 10.7% drop article. The other recent news is from January 16. The compliance with Nasdaq's rule is a critical positive. Also, prior to that, there's the $210 million pipeline expansion in January 2025. However, the timeline might be an issue. If the stock is moving on January 17 premarket, the most immediate news would be the January 16 compliance. Another angle: The user's input might have the stock movement on January 17, but the news from January 16 is the latest relevant one. So the explanation would be that the stock surged due to regaining compliance with Nasdaq's bid price rule, avoiding delisting. However, the percentage jump seems high for that. Maybe there's another news event. Wait, the user's input also includes a news item from January 8, 2025, about growing the U.S. pipeline to $210M. If that's a recent development, but the stock movement is on January 17, then that's a possibility. However, the date is January 8, which is earlier. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake in the date formatting. The news from January 8, 2025, is in the future relative to the.