La cadena BNB supera a Solana en cuanto a los flujos de stablecoins recibidos: ¿Es un punto de inflexión o simplemente una reversión temporal?

Generado por agente de IAAnders MiroRevisado porAInvest News Editorial Team
domingo, 11 de enero de 2026, 2:26 am ET2 min de lectura

The stablecoin market in Q4 2025 witnessed a seismic shift as

Chain and vied for dominance in capital flows. While Solana's ecosystem has long been celebrated for its speed and DeFi innovation, BNB Chain's strategic focus on low-cost infrastructure and utility agreements has sparked a critical question: Is this a structural realignment in blockchain adoption, or a temporary blip in a fragmented market?

Solana's Stumble and BNB Chain's Surge

Solana's Q4 2025 performance was a mixed bag. The chain

from newly launched ETFs and $1.4 billion in network revenue-a 48-fold increase over two years. However, by year-end, which was overshadowed by a 97% drop in active traders and a 58% decline in SOL's price during the slump . This volatility exposed Solana's reliance on speculative activity, particularly in its .

BNB Chain, meanwhile, leveraged its "0 Fee Carnival" initiative to subsidize stablecoin transfers,

. By Q4, , with daily stablecoin volumes exceeding $124 billion . This growth was underpinned by BNB Chain's focus on retail and peer-to-peer commerce, attracting projects like a major platform that migrated from Solana in 2025, .

Capital Flow Dynamics: Speed vs. Scale

The divergence in capital flows between the two chains reflects their distinct value propositions. Solana's appeal lies in its blistering transaction speeds and DeFi ecosystem, which attracted institutional interest and

. However, its Q4 network activity collapse-despite -highlighted vulnerabilities in liquidity concentration and user retention.

BNB Chain, conversely, prioritized scalability and cost efficiency. Its Parallel Execution upgrades

, while its underscored its role as a stablecoin infrastructure hub. The chain's ability to attract projects from Solana, , illustrates its competitive edge in balancing low fees with a mature user base.

Regulatory Clarity and Institutional Tailwinds

The broader stablecoin market's

was fueled by clearer U.S. regulatory signals and institutional adoption. remained the dominant network, but Solana and BNB Chain capitalized on fragmented liquidity. Solana's DeFi ecosystem and BNB Chain's utility-driven approach both benefited from this environment, though their trajectories diverged.

Solana's institutional appeal-

-was offset by its Q4 user exodus. BNB Chain, however, leveraged its TVL and stablecoin infrastructure to secure long-term partnerships, for cross-chain commerce.

A Turning Point or a Transient Reversal?

The question of whether BNB Chain's surpassing of Solana in stablecoin inflows is a turning point hinges on sustainability. Solana's technical advantages and DeFi momentum suggest a potential rebound, particularly if institutional interest in its ecosystem stabilizes. However, BNB Chain's focus on low-cost, high-volume use cases-such as retail payments and cross-border commerce-

favoring stablecoin utility over speculation.

For investors, the key lies in monitoring network activity metrics. Solana's Q4 collapse in

raises red flags, while BNB Chain's and strategic initiatives like the "0 Fee Carnival" . The stablecoin market's also suggests that both chains will remain relevant, but their roles may evolve: Solana as a high-speed DeFi hub and BNB Chain as a utility-driven infrastructure layer.

Conclusion

The Q4 2025 data paints a nuanced picture. While BNB Chain's stablecoin inflows outpaced Solana's in the short term, the broader blockchain landscape remains fragmented. Solana's technical prowess and institutional backing could yet reclaim its position, but BNB Chain's strategic focus on cost efficiency and utility has created a durable foundation. For now, this appears to be a structural shift-driven by regulatory clarity and institutional adoption-rather than a transient reversal. Investors should watch for further migrations, TVL trends, and regulatory developments to gauge the longevity of this realignment.

author avatar
Anders Miro

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios