Blackstone's $660M Trading Volume Slides to 179th as Liquidity Constraints Weigh on Alternative Assets Sector

Generado por agente de IAAinvest Volume Radar
jueves, 25 de septiembre de 2025, 7:09 pm ET1 min de lectura
BX--

On September 25, 2025, BlackstoneBX-- (BX) traded with a volume of $660 million, ranking 179th in market activity. The asset management giant closed 1.39% lower, reflecting a mixed investor sentiment amid sector-specific dynamics.

Recent market activity suggests a focus on liquidity constraints within alternative asset classes. Analysts noted that Blackstone's performance is closely tied to broader trends in private equity and real estate markets, which have shown volatility due to shifting interest rate expectations. Institutional investors have been recalibrating exposure to non-traded assets, impacting capital flows into Blackstone's core business segments.

Operational updates from the firm highlighted ongoing cost optimization initiatives, with management reaffirming long-term growth targets despite near-term headwinds. Strategic repositioning in debt markets and expansion of digital asset capabilities were emphasized as key differentiators in a competitive landscape. However, market participants remain cautious about macroeconomic uncertainties affecting investor risk appetite.

To set up this back-test accurately, I need to pin down a few details about the investment universe and the exact execution rules, because the approach you’ve described involves re-balancing a multi-stock portfolio every trading day. Universe: Should I consider all U.S. listed common stocks (≈6,000 tickers), only the S&P 1500 constituents, or another universe? Are ETFs, ADRs or penny-stocks (<$1) to be excluded? Volume definition: Rank by dollar volume (price × shares traded) or by share volume? Use the current day’s volume (buy at today’s close) or yesterday’s volume (buy at next day’s open)? Execution & holding period: Entry - buy at today’s close or tomorrow’s open? Exit - sell at the next day’s close or open? Do we assume equal-weighted positions across the 500 names? Once I have those points, I’ll generate the data-retrieval plan and run the back-test.

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios