¿El ciclo de cuatro años del Bitcoin ya ha terminado, o simplemente sigue evolucionando?

Generado por agente de IAAdrian HoffnerRevisado porAInvest News Editorial Team
sábado, 10 de enero de 2026, 6:16 am ET2 min de lectura

Bitcoin's four-year halving cycle has long been a cornerstone of crypto market analysis. Historically, these events have triggered predictable price surges, driven by scarcity mechanics and speculative fervor. But in the wake of the 2024 halving, a critical question emerges: Is the four-year cycle dead, or is it evolving into a new paradigm shaped by structural demand and institutional adoption?

The 2024 Halving: A New Market Regime

The 2024 halving, which reduced block rewards from 6.25 to 3.125 BTC, marked a pivotal shift in Bitcoin's market dynamics. While the asset's price surged 31% in the year following the event, reaching $83,671 by April 2025, this performance was notably muted compared to prior cycles. For instance, the 2012 and 2016 halvings saw multi-year bull runs with returns exceeding 100% within 12–18 months. The 2024 cycle, however, unfolded in a context of maturing institutional adoption and macroeconomic integration,

.

Miners adapted to reduced block rewards by innovating operational strategies, such as

. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's network hash rate exceeded one zetta hash per second in April 2025, . These structural adaptations suggest that the mining industry is evolving beyond mere reliance on halving-driven tailwinds.

Institutional Adoption: A Structural Game-Changer

The most profound shift post-2024 halving is the structural demand introduced by institutional investors. The approval of spot

ETFs in the U.S. and other jurisdictions in 2024 , with major funds like BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC leading the charge. By 2025, , a stark contrast to pre-2024 cycles where retail speculation dominated.

This institutional influx has transformed Bitcoin's role in portfolios. No longer viewed as a speculative trade, it is now

and enhancing risk-adjusted returns. For example, (excluding stablecoins)-underscores its outperformance against altcoins like and . This dominance is further reinforced by its , particularly during periods of geopolitical uncertainty.

The Evolution of the Four-Year Cycle

Historically, Bitcoin's four-year cycle has followed a predictable pattern: Accumulation → Growth → Bubble → Crash. The 2024 cycle, however, deviated from this script. While the asset reached a peak of $126,210 in October 2025-12 months post-halving-it

, marking the first-ever negative post-halving year. This anomaly reflects the influence of institutional behavior, which over halving calendars.

Analysts argue that the cycle is not dead but evolving. Institutional investors act as

, thereby dampening volatility. For instance, , lower than the 3.24% in 2012 and 3.92% in 2020. This maturation of the market suggests that Bitcoin's price is -such as ETF inflows and macroeconomic trends-rather than purely cyclical ones.

Strategic Investment Timing: Balancing Cycles and Structure

For investors, the evolving cycle demands a nuanced approach to timing. While historical patterns still offer guidance (e.g., peaks 12–18 months post-halving), structural demand metrics now carry equal weight. Key indicators include:
1. ETF Inflows:

highlights institutional confidence.
2. Market Dominance: signals a balanced market, with room for altcoin participation.
3. On-Chain Metrics: through diversified revenue streams (e.g., ordinal inscriptions, Layer 2 projects) indicate network resilience.

Looking ahead,

, with price targets clustering between $120K and $170K. Institutional investors, , are expected to maintain their presence despite risks like ETF outflows and cybersecurity challenges.

Conclusion: A New Era for Bitcoin

The 2024 halving did not kill the four-year cycle-it redefined it. Bitcoin's market is now a hybrid of cyclical scarcity and structural demand, with institutional adoption acting as the bridge between the two. For investors, this means abandoning rigid adherence to halving calendars in favor of a dual-lens approach: analyzing both Bitcoin's inherent scarcity and the macroeconomic forces shaping institutional behavior.

As the asset transitions from a speculative retail play to a strategic institutional allocation, the question is no longer whether the four-year cycle is dead-but whether investors are ready to evolve with it.

author avatar
Adrian Hoffner

Comentarios



Add a public comment...
Sin comentarios

Aún no hay comentarios