Acciones de tesoro de Bitcoin como una estrategia de apalancamiento: Requisitos de capital y apalancamiento corporativo en 2025

The rise of Bitcoin treasury stocks in 2025 has redefined how corporations and investors engage with digital assets. These companies, operating as hybrid entities between traditional finance and crypto, have leveraged capital mandates and aggressive financial engineering to amplify Bitcoin exposure. By raising billions through equity and debt, they've created a self-reinforcing cycle where Bitcoin price gains directly translate to stock price appreciation-and vice versa. This model, while lucrative in bull markets, now faces scrutiny as volatility and regulatory shifts reshape the landscape.

Capital Mandate-Driven Demand: The Flywheel Effect

Bitcoin treasury companies function as vehicles for capital allocation, with their business models centered on acquiring Bitcoin through perpetual fundraising. A prime example is Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), which executed its "21/21 Plan" to raise $21 billion via equity and $21 billion through debt by late 2025. This approach allowed the company to accumulate 660,624 BTC, valued at $62 billion, by leveraging convertible bonds, preferred shares, and at-the-market equity programs.

The capital mandate-driven strategy hinges on a flywheel mechanism: as Bitcoin's price rises, the company's stock price surges, enabling further equity issuance to buy more Bitcoin. This creates a compounding effect, where each round of fundraising amplifies exposure to the underlying asset. According to a report by Galaxy Research, companies like Strategy and Metaplanet traded at a 73% premium to the value of their Bitcoin holdings in 2025, reflecting investor appetite for leveraged exposure.

However, this model relies on sustained Bitcoin price appreciation. When the crypto market corrected in late 2025, the flywheel reversed. Companies like Metaplanet, which held 30,823 BTC, faced unrealized losses exceeding $530 million as Bitcoin fell below $90,000. The same capital mandates that fueled growth now exacerbated losses, as dilutive equity issuance became untenable in a bearish environment.

Corporate Leverage Advantages: Exploiting Regulatory Arbitrage

Bitcoin treasury companies have exploited leverage advantages unavailable to traditional investment vehicles. By issuing convertible bonds and perpetual preferred shares, they bypass regulatory constraints on leveraged crypto exposure. For instance, Strategy's issuance of $2 billion in zero-coupon convertible bonds in February 2025 allowed it to fund Bitcoin purchases while deferring interest payments-a structure favored by institutional investors seeking delta-neutral positions.

This leverage also appeals to investors in jurisdictions with restrictive crypto regulations. As noted in a Bloomberg analysis, investors in the UK or Japan, where direct crypto trading is limited, gained exposure through these companies' equities. The result is a hybrid asset class that combines the liquidity of stocks with the volatility of Bitcoin, amplified by corporate leverage.

Yet, this arbitrage comes with risks. The lack of regulatory oversight has led to calls for reclassifying these companies as investment vehicles. A report by OMFIF highlights that their operational structure-raising capital to buy a single asset-mirrors hedge funds or ETFs, yet they remain unregistered. This regulatory gray area raises concerns about investor protections, particularly as leverage magnifies downside risk.

Risks and the Road Ahead

The collapse of equity premiums in late 2025 exposed the fragility of the leveraged model. As Bitcoin prices declined, companies like Strategy and Nakamoto faced stock price drawdowns exceeding 40%, eroding the very premiums that enabled their fundraising. The reliance on equity issuance to fund Bitcoin purchases became self-defeating, as falling stock prices diluted existing shareholders and raised questions about long-term sustainability.

Looking ahead, 2026 may mark a pivot toward operational resilience. Companies are exploring diversification strategies, such as integrating Bitcoin into custody services or infrastructure projects, to reduce dependency on price volatility. Regulatory scrutiny will also intensify, with demands for enhanced disclosures and potential reclassification as investment vehicles.

Conclusion

Bitcoin treasury stocks represent a novel, albeit volatile, leveraged play on Bitcoin's price action. Their capital mandate-driven strategies and corporate leverage advantages have amplified returns in bull markets but introduced systemic risks during downturns. As the sector evolves, investors must weigh the potential for outsized gains against the fragility of a model built on reflexivity and regulatory arbitrage. For now, these companies remain a testament to the ingenuity-and peril-of financial engineering in the crypto age.