Noticias de hoy de Bitcoin: Los comerciantes de Bitcoin se concentran en la política, la liquidez en lugar de las reducciones

Bitcoin's four-year price cycle is still active, but the forces driving it have changed, according to industry analysts. Markus Thielen of 10x Research explained that the cycle is now influenced more by political developments, liquidity conditions, and election cycles than by the cryptocurrency's halving events. He highlighted that Bitcoin's market peaks in 2013, 2017, and 2021 coincided with U.S. presidential election years, suggesting a stronger link between politics and price action according to analysis.

The shift in drivers has implications for how investors track and predict Bitcoin's movements. Unlike in the past, when supply shocks from halvings often triggered price surges, today's market behavior is more closely tied to macroeconomic and political factors as research shows. Thielen noted that the timing of halvings has varied over the years, making it a less reliable indicator for market peaks according to Thielen.

Political uncertainty, particularly around U.S. election outcomes, affects investor sentiment and capital flows. As Thielen explained, the likelihood of a sitting president's party losing key seats can influence market dynamics, potentially dampening aggressive policy agendas according to analysis. In a post-Fed rate-cut environment, Bitcoin has struggled to gain traction, partly because institutional investors have become more cautious amid mixed policy signals and tighter liquidity according to market data.

Why the Four-Year Cycle Has Evolved

The four-year cycle was once closely tied to Bitcoin's halving events, which reduce the rate of new Bitcoin creation. These events historically led to supply shocks and subsequent price increases according to historical data. However, Thielen argues that the cycle remains intact but is now shaped by broader economic and political factors. He pointed to the growing influence of U.S. election cycles, where fiscal stimulus and regulatory changes play a larger role in Bitcoin's performance as research indicates.

Institutional investors now dominate the crypto market, shifting the dynamics compared to earlier cycles driven by retail speculation and leveraged trading according to industry analysis. As capital inflows into Bitcoin have slowed, so too has the upward momentum needed for a strong breakout according to market trends. Thielen emphasized that without a significant improvement in liquidity, Bitcoin is likely to remain range-bound and consolidate rather than enter a parabolic rally according to expert analysis.

What This Means for Investors

Investors must adapt their strategies to account for the evolving drivers of Bitcoin's cycle. Instead of focusing solely on halving events, they should monitor political calendars and liquidity conditions according to analysis. U.S. elections, in particular, have become key timing factors, with fiscal and monetary policy decisions directly affecting market liquidity and investor behavior according to market reports.

The maturation of Bitcoin as an asset class means it now responds more to macroeconomic trends than to purely technical supply events as industry experts note. Thielen noted that Bitcoin's historical alignment with election years suggests that political and liquidity factors are increasingly dominant according to research. As the cryptocurrency becomes more integrated into mainstream finance, cycles driven by politics and liquidity may become the new norm according to industry analysis.

Risks to the Outlook

Despite the evolving cycle, Bitcoin remains vulnerable to downside risks. Institutional participation does not eliminate volatility, and even widely used products like spot ETFs can experience sharp outflows according to market reports. For example, BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust saw a record single-day outflow of $523 million during a market pullback according to financial data. Regulatory shifts and policy changes can also alter the landscape for Bitcoin investment, affecting both entry and exit strategies as analysts warn.

Liquidity conditions are another critical factor. While the Federal Reserve has taken steps to stabilize short-term funding markets, including resuming Treasury bill purchases, the broader implications for Bitcoin remain uncertain according to economic analysis. If liquidity tightens further, it could limit the upside potential for Bitcoin, reinforcing its consolidation phase as market data shows.