Bitcoin ETFs' $363M Exodus: Largest Since U.S. Launch Amid Fed Caution
Spot BitcoinBTC-- ETFs experienced a significant outflow of $363 million on September 22, 2025, marking the largest single-day withdrawal for the category since their U.S. launch in early 2024[1]. This outflow occurred despite BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), the largest Bitcoin ETF, recording $128.9 million in inflows on September 24 after two days of selling pressure[2]. The mixed performance highlights the volatility in institutional sentiment toward Bitcoin, with Fidelity’s FBTC leading the redemptions at $276.7 million on September 22[3]. Cumulative outflows for the week reached $1.07 billion across Bitcoin and EthereumETH-- ETFs, with Ethereum-focused funds losing $79.36 million on September 24 alone[4].
The outflows coincide with Bitcoin’s price struggles to maintain key support levels, currently trading near $113,000 after a sharp decline from its mid-August peak of $124,000[5]. Analysts attribute the sell-off to cautious positioning ahead of Federal Reserve policy decisions and concerns over inflation. The Fed’s recent 25-basis-point rate cut, which brought the benchmark rate to 4.00%–4.25%, was framed as a “risk management” measure rather than a commitment to aggressive easing, tempering expectations for further rate reductions in 2025[3]. This uncertainty has heightened sensitivity to Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks, with investors re-evaluating exposure to risk assets[6].
Bitcoin spot ETFs, which surpassed $149.74 billion in assets under management by September 24, have seen fluctuating inflows since their SEC approval in January 2024[2]. While the category attracted over $57 billion in cumulative net inflows by 2025, recent outflows reflect broader market corrections and institutional repositioning. For example, BlackRock’s IBITIBIT--, which holds 4% of all Bitcoin, faced a record $333 million outflow on another trading day, signaling short-term profit-taking amid price volatility. Fidelity’s FBTC, the second-largest Bitcoin ETF, also saw $276.7 million in redemptions, underscoring the sector’s sensitivity to macroeconomic signals[3].
The divergent performance between Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs further illustrates institutional preferences. While Bitcoin ETFs saw universal positive flows on September 24, Ethereum ETFs posted $79.36 million in outflows, extending their losing streak to three days[2]. This gap may reflect ongoing concerns about Ethereum’s regulatory clarity and network competition. Weekly trading volumes for Bitcoin ETFs reached $2.58 billion on September 24, compared to $972 million for Ethereum products, highlighting the disparity in institutional engagement[2].
Market analysts suggest the outflows are primarily driven by short-term positioning changes rather than long-term pessimism. Ali Martinez, an on-chain analyst, noted that the sell-off could reverse if inflation data aligns with expectations, particularly ahead of the upcoming Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report[3]. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s technical indicators, including a bearish MACD and RSI below 50, suggest lingering downward pressure, though institutional accumulation and ETF demand provide a macroeconomic tailwind[5].
The ETF outflows come amid broader crypto market turbulence, with $1.6 billion in liquidations reported on September 21 and over $500 million in Ethereum positions wiped out[1]. Despite these challenges, Bitcoin’s institutional ownership remains robust, with 145 companies holding public Bitcoin reserves. However, a quarter of these firms now have market caps below their crypto holdings, raising questions about the sustainability of the corporate treasury model[1].
As the market navigates this volatile phase, the next key catalysts include the Fed’s policy trajectory, regulatory developments, and Bitcoin’s ability to reclaim critical resistance levels. For now, the $363 million outflow underscores the sensitivity of spot Bitcoin ETFs to macroeconomic shifts and institutional sentiment, with further fluctuations likely as traders await clarity on the path to monetary easing[1].

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios