Barrick Gold's Muted Gains Amid 45% Volume Drop Leave It Ranking 284th in U.S. Liquidity
Barrick Gold Corp. (GOLD) closed at $18.94 on Oct. 3, 2025, gaining 0.09% despite a 45% drop in trading volume to $400 million, ranking 284th among U.S. equities by liquidity. The miner’s muted price action contrasted with a broader commodities rally driven by renewed U.S. rate cut speculation.
Recent operational updates highlighted a 12% year-over-year decline in gold production at its Veladero mine in Argentina due to lower-than-expected grades. Management attributed the shortfall to temporary geological complexities rather than structural issues, maintaining full-year output guidance of 4.5 million ounces. Analysts noted the result aligns with historical volatility patterns at the high-grade site.
Strategic partnerships remain a focal point, with the company reaffirming its 50-50 joint venture with Randgold Resources to advance the Kibali expansion in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The project, expected to boost annual throughput by 20%, has secured $450 million in pre-financing commitments. Equity analysts emphasized the low-cost nature of the development relative to peers.
To run this back-test rigorously I need a few clarifications: 1. Market universe — Are we looking at U.S.-listed equities only (NYSE + NASDAQ), or another universe (e.g., all stocks globally, China A-shares, etc.)? 2. Rebalancing time of day — Do we pick the “top-500 by trading volume” based on the day’s full volume (which would only be known after the close) and then enter at next-day open? Or do you want to form the portfolio at today’s close using today’s volume and exit at tomorrow’s close? 3. Weighting scheme — Equal-weight across the 500 names, or volume-weighted / capitalization-weighted? 4. Trading frictions — Should we include any estimate of commission, bid–ask spread or slippage? If you have specific values in mind, please let me know. 5. Capital base — Is the back-test run in percentage terms (i.e., fully-invested each day), or do you want to assume a fixed notional capital (e.g., $10 million) for P&L reporting? Once I have these details I can lay out the exact data retrieval plan and begin the back-test workflow.




Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios