Azerbaijan's BTC Pipeline Woes and the Future of Caspian Energy Corridors

Azerbaijan's Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, once a symbol of regional energy independence, is now facing a quiet crisis. According to a report by Caspian Post, Azerbaijan's BTC exports declined by 4% year-to-date as of October 2024, despite total oil exports remaining stable at 32.5 million tons for the year. This decline is driven by a combination of infrastructure constraints, rising transportation costs, and shifting dynamics in Kazakh oil exports. For investors, the BTC's struggles highlight broader vulnerabilities in Caspian energy corridors and underscore the need to reassess long-term risks while identifying undervalued alternatives in the Caucasus.

The BTC's Structural Weaknesses

The BTC pipeline, designed to transport 1 million barrels per day, has long faced underutilization due to its high operational costs. A 2024 analysis by Astanatimes revealed that shipping oil via the BTC is approximately three times more expensive than through the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC), which remains the dominant route for Kazakh exports. This cost disparity has limited the BTC's appeal, even as Kazakhstan seeks to diversify away from Russian-controlled infrastructure.

Compounding these economic challenges are technical and geopolitical risks. The February 2024 drone attack on the Kropotkinskaya station—a critical CPC hub—disrupted Kazakh exports and accelerated interest in the BTC as a backup route. However, the BTC itself is not immune to vulnerabilities. Aging infrastructure and limited capacity at the Aktau port, a key loading point for Kazakh oil, have further constrained throughput. Without significant investment in port modernization and pipeline upgrades, the BTC's reliability will remain in question.

Long-Term Risks to Caspian Energy Corridors

The BTC's struggles are emblematic of broader systemic risks in the Caspian energy landscape. Azerbaijan's own oil production is declining naturally, with the ACG field requiring costly developments like the ACE platform to sustain output. Meanwhile, Kazakhstan's pivot to the BTC has exposed the region's overreliance on a single pipeline. A 2025 report by The Diplomat notes that while Kazakhstan shipped 1.4 million tons of oil via the BTC in 2024, this pales against the 55.4 million tons handled by the CPC. This imbalance suggests that the BTC cannot fully replace the CPC, even in a crisis.

Geopolitical tensions further amplify these risks. The Caspian Sea's legal status—still contested by littoral states—and the region's proximity to Iran and Russia create an environment where energy projects are vulnerable to external shocks. For instance, the Trump-Brokered Caucasus Corridor (TRIPP), a U.S.-backed initiative to connect Azerbaijan to Nakhchivan via Armenian territory, has faced fierce opposition from Iran, which views it as a “political plot”. Such geopolitical friction could delay or derail critical infrastructure projects, leaving energy corridors exposed.

Undervalued Alternatives in the Caucasus

Despite these challenges, the Caucasus offers untapped opportunities for investors willing to navigate the region's complexities. One such opportunity lies in the TRIPP corridor. While fraught with political risks, the project could unlock $45 billion in regional trade and energy flows by providing an alternative route for Caspian oil and gas. U.S. firms like Schlumberger and Bechtel are already involved in its development, signaling confidence in its long-term potential. However, success hinges on resolving Armenian constitutional hurdles and Iran's military posturing.

Another overlooked area is renewable energy infrastructure. Azerbaijan has set ambitious targets to increase renewables to 30% of its energy mix by 2030. Yet, as of 2025, policy implementation remains weak, with inadequate incentives for private investment. A 2023 study by SAGE Journals highlights structural barriers, including opaque regulatory frameworks and limited state support. For investors, this represents a high-risk, high-reward opportunity: early-stage renewable projects could yield outsized returns if policy reforms accelerate.

Conclusion: Navigating the New Energy Landscape

Azerbaijan's BTC pipeline is a cautionary tale of underinvestment and geopolitical fragility. For investors, the key takeaway is clear: diversification is no longer optional. While the BTC remains a strategic asset, its limitations necessitate a reevaluation of Caspian energy corridors. Projects like the TRIPP corridor and renewable energy initiatives in Azerbaijan offer promising alternatives—but they require patience, political acumen, and a willingness to shoulder short-term risks.

As the region grapples with shifting export dynamics and infrastructure bottlenecks, the Caucasus is poised to become a critical node in global energy markets. For those who act decisively, the rewards could be substantial.

Source:
[1] Kazakhstan Faces Multi-Million Losses—Is the Azerbaijani Route the Solution [https://caspianpost.com/energy/kazakhstan-faces-multi-million-losses-is-the-azerbaijani-route-the-solution]
[2] Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Offers Promising but Costly Alternative for Kazakh Oil Export [https://astanatimes.com/2024/11/baku-tbilisi-ceyhan-pipeline-offers-promising-but-costly-alternative-for-kazakhstans-oil-export-experts-say/]
[3] Kazakhstan Aims to Increase Oil Exports via BTC Pipeline [https://thediplomat.com/2025/03/kazakhstan-aims-to-increase-oil-exports-via-btc-pipeline/]
[4] The Role of Caspian Energy in Global Supply Chains [https://www.environmentenergyleader.com/stories/the-role-of-caspian-energy-in-global-supply-chains,64169]
[5] Trans-Caspian oil transit via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline [https://caliber.az/en/post/azerbaijan-becomes-key-hub-for-kazakh-oil-exports-as-russia-s-role-declines]
[6] Assessing the Strategic and Economic Risks of the Trump-Brokered Caucasus Corridor for U.S. and Global Investors [https://www.ainvest.com/news/assessing-strategic-economic-risks-trump-brokered-caucasus-corridor-global-investors-2508/]
[7] Renewable Energy Targets and Policies in Traditional Oil ... [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/18793665231177720]