Author of Vetoed California AI Bill Says Issue ‘Not Going Away’
Generado por agente de IAAinvest Technical Radar
lunes, 30 de septiembre de 2024, 1:15 pm ET1 min de lectura
California's ambitious attempt to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) has been met with a veto from Governor Gavin Newsom, but the bill's author, state Sen. Scott Wiener, remains undeterred. In an interview with Playbook, Wiener expressed his disappointment with the veto but emphasized that the issue of AI safety is far from resolved. "This is not going away," he said, highlighting the urgent need for regulations to protect the public from potential AI-related risks.
The Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act, SB 1047, aimed to establish safety measures for large-scale AI models, requiring companies to test their models and disclose safety protocols. Newsom vetoed the bill, citing concerns about its broad scope and potential burden on AI companies. However, Wiener believes that the bill's veto has sparked a much-needed conversation about AI safety and that the issue will continue to gain traction in the coming years.
Wiener's commitment to pushing for AI regulations is unwavering, and he plans to reintroduce the bill or a similar measure in the future. He acknowledged that the task of balancing innovation and public safety is challenging but emphasized the importance of finding a solution that protects Californians from AI-related threats. "We can't just let the genie out of the bottle and hope for the best," Wiener said, stressing the need for proactive measures to mitigate potential AI risks.
The veto of SB 1047 has not dampened public support for AI regulations in California. A recent poll conducted by the University of Southern California (USC) found that about 57 percent of the state's likely voters supported Wiener's bill, with only about 15 percent opposed. This strong public backing suggests that the issue of AI safety will remain a priority for lawmakers in the coming years.
As the AI industry continues to grow and evolve, the need for regulations to protect the public from potential risks will become increasingly pressing. Wiener's determination to push for AI safety measures, despite the veto, underscores the importance of this issue in California and beyond. The conversation about AI regulations is far from over, and lawmakers, industry experts, and the public will continue to grapple with the challenges and opportunities presented by this rapidly advancing technology.
The Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act, SB 1047, aimed to establish safety measures for large-scale AI models, requiring companies to test their models and disclose safety protocols. Newsom vetoed the bill, citing concerns about its broad scope and potential burden on AI companies. However, Wiener believes that the bill's veto has sparked a much-needed conversation about AI safety and that the issue will continue to gain traction in the coming years.
Wiener's commitment to pushing for AI regulations is unwavering, and he plans to reintroduce the bill or a similar measure in the future. He acknowledged that the task of balancing innovation and public safety is challenging but emphasized the importance of finding a solution that protects Californians from AI-related threats. "We can't just let the genie out of the bottle and hope for the best," Wiener said, stressing the need for proactive measures to mitigate potential AI risks.
The veto of SB 1047 has not dampened public support for AI regulations in California. A recent poll conducted by the University of Southern California (USC) found that about 57 percent of the state's likely voters supported Wiener's bill, with only about 15 percent opposed. This strong public backing suggests that the issue of AI safety will remain a priority for lawmakers in the coming years.
As the AI industry continues to grow and evolve, the need for regulations to protect the public from potential risks will become increasingly pressing. Wiener's determination to push for AI safety measures, despite the veto, underscores the importance of this issue in California and beyond. The conversation about AI regulations is far from over, and lawmakers, industry experts, and the public will continue to grapple with the challenges and opportunities presented by this rapidly advancing technology.
Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema



Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios