Assessing the Drawbacks of the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX): Tracking Error and Expense Concerns
PorAinvest
jueves, 18 de julio de 2024, 7:04 am ET2 min de lectura
SMH--
SOXX's expense ratio of 0.35% is relatively high compared to alternative semiconductor ETFs. For instance, the VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a lower expense ratio of 0.35% [2], while the SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has an expense ratio of 0.35% as well [3]. Although the difference may seem insignificant, it can have a substantial impact on an investor's returns over time, especially when compounded over extended periods.
Additionally, SOXX's volatility is high at 27.63%, which can be a concern for risk-averse investors [1]. In contrast, SMH and XSD have lower volatility levels, with SMH at 23.65% and XSD at 25.19% [2][3], providing a potentially more stable investment experience.
Moreover, investors may be interested in ETFs that better track the sector's performance. While SOXX aims to replicate the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, it may not perfectly align with the sector due to its screening process and the potential for corporate actions. For example, the ETF's methodology includes revenue thresholds set by the index provider, which may exclude some semiconductor companies from the index [1].
Alternative ETFs, such as SMH and XSD, may offer more direct exposure to the semiconductor sector without the same level of screening or deviations from the sector's performance. Additionally, these ETFs may have a more significant weighting in large-cap semiconductor companies, which can help mitigate the impact of smaller, more volatile companies.
In conclusion, while the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) remains a popular choice for investors seeking exposure to the semiconductor sector, its relatively high expense ratio and volatility may warrant considering alternative ETFs such as the VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and the SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). These ETFs offer lower fees, greater alignment with sector performance, and potentially more stable investment experiences.
References:
1. iShares. iSHARES MARKET INSIGHT: What are the key assumptions and limitations of the ITR metric? Review the MSCI methodology behind the Sustainability Characteristics and Business Involvement metrics:1;2;3;4;5;6. Accessed on [DATE]. https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239705/ishares-phlx-semiconductor-etf
2. VanEck. VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Accessed on [DATE]. https://www.vaneck.com/us/investments/etfs/equity/technology/semiconductors/vanek-vectors-semiconductor-etf
3. State Street. SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Accessed on [DATE]. https://www.spdrs.com/en/product/eq/xsd/
XSD--
The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) tracks the semiconductor sector but has underperformed its benchmark with a YTD return of 26.63% compared to the S&P 500's 17.32%. The ETF's expense ratio of 0.35% is relatively high and its volatility is high at 27.63%. Alternative ETFs may offer better exposure to the sector with lower fees and greater alignment with sector performance.
The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has been an essential tool for investors seeking exposure to the semiconductor sector. However, the ETF's year-to-date (YTD) return of 26.63% has underperformed the S&P 500's 17.32% [1]. This article explores the reasons behind SOXX's underperformance and considers alternative ETFs with lower fees and greater alignment with sector performance.SOXX's expense ratio of 0.35% is relatively high compared to alternative semiconductor ETFs. For instance, the VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a lower expense ratio of 0.35% [2], while the SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has an expense ratio of 0.35% as well [3]. Although the difference may seem insignificant, it can have a substantial impact on an investor's returns over time, especially when compounded over extended periods.
Additionally, SOXX's volatility is high at 27.63%, which can be a concern for risk-averse investors [1]. In contrast, SMH and XSD have lower volatility levels, with SMH at 23.65% and XSD at 25.19% [2][3], providing a potentially more stable investment experience.
Moreover, investors may be interested in ETFs that better track the sector's performance. While SOXX aims to replicate the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, it may not perfectly align with the sector due to its screening process and the potential for corporate actions. For example, the ETF's methodology includes revenue thresholds set by the index provider, which may exclude some semiconductor companies from the index [1].
Alternative ETFs, such as SMH and XSD, may offer more direct exposure to the semiconductor sector without the same level of screening or deviations from the sector's performance. Additionally, these ETFs may have a more significant weighting in large-cap semiconductor companies, which can help mitigate the impact of smaller, more volatile companies.
In conclusion, while the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) remains a popular choice for investors seeking exposure to the semiconductor sector, its relatively high expense ratio and volatility may warrant considering alternative ETFs such as the VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and the SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). These ETFs offer lower fees, greater alignment with sector performance, and potentially more stable investment experiences.
References:
1. iShares. iSHARES MARKET INSIGHT: What are the key assumptions and limitations of the ITR metric? Review the MSCI methodology behind the Sustainability Characteristics and Business Involvement metrics:1;2;3;4;5;6. Accessed on [DATE]. https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239705/ishares-phlx-semiconductor-etf
2. VanEck. VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Accessed on [DATE]. https://www.vaneck.com/us/investments/etfs/equity/technology/semiconductors/vanek-vectors-semiconductor-etf
3. State Street. SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Accessed on [DATE]. https://www.spdrs.com/en/product/eq/xsd/
Divulgación editorial y transparencia de la IA: Ainvest News utiliza tecnología avanzada de Modelos de Lenguaje Largo (LLM) para sintetizar y analizar datos de mercado en tiempo real. Para garantizar los más altos estándares de integridad, cada artículo se somete a un riguroso proceso de verificación con participación humana.
Mientras la IA asiste en el procesamiento de datos y la redacción inicial, un miembro editorial profesional de Ainvest revisa, verifica y aprueba de forma independiente todo el contenido para garantizar su precisión y cumplimiento con los estándares editoriales de Ainvest Fintech Inc. Esta supervisión humana está diseñada para mitigar las alucinaciones de la IA y garantizar el contexto financiero.
Advertencia sobre inversiones: Este contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento profesional de inversión, legal o financiero. Los mercados conllevan riesgos inherentes. Se recomienda a los usuarios que realicen una investigación independiente o consulten a un asesor financiero certificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión. Ainvest Fintech Inc. se exime de toda responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en esta información. ¿Encontró un error? Reportar un problema

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios