Under Armour C shares surge 16.83% intraday after Q4 earnings and revenue exceed forecasts.

think> Okay, let me try to work through this. The user wants me to act as a financial analyst explaining a stock's price movement based on recent news. The stock in question is Under Armour C, which had an intraday up of 16.82926829%. I need to round that percentage to two decimal places, so that becomes 16.83%. First, I need to determine the direction and session. The stock went up during intraday trading. Now, looking at the news events provided. There are six reasons, but some of them seem to be duplicates or similar. Let me check each one. Reason 1 mentions Under Armour C's earnings beat by $0.11 and revenue topped. The summary also says it closed at $6.15, up 43.69% in 3 months and down 8.21% in 12 months. The content is just "Enable JavaScript...", so maybe the actual content isn't accessible. But the summary suggests positive EPS. Reason 2 is almost the same as Reason 1, same title and summary. So maybe duplicate info. Reason 3 is in Spanish, mentions "supera por 0,11$ las previsiones de BPA" which translates to "exceeded by $0.11 the EPS estimates." The summary talks about mixed revisions but positive EPS. Reason 4 is similar to the others, again mentioning the $6.15 closing price and the same percentage changes. Reason 5 is in French, similar content: "Le BPA de Under Armour C a dépassé les attentes de 0,11..." meaning EPS exceeded by $0.11. Reason 6 is in Russian, and it's more detailed. It states that Under Armour C reported Q4 results that beat estimates. Earnings per share were $0.09, revenue $1.33B, both above the estimates of -$0.02 and $1.31B. It also mentions that the stock is following the trend of the "Cyclicals" sector, with Amazon and Tesla also beating estimates. So all these reasons point to Under Armour C's Q4 earnings and revenue beating expectations. The EPS beat by $0.11 (as per the first reasons) and the Russian one says $0.09, but that might be a translation issue or a different figure. Wait, the Russian one says the actual EPS was $0.09, while the estimate was -$0.02. That's a significant beat. The revenue was $1.33B vs. $1.31B expected. The key here is that the earnings and revenue were better than expected, which is positive news. The stock had a large intraday gain of 16.83%, which aligns with positive news. Now, the user wants a concise summary. The example they gave uses a structure where the company's name, movement, session, and the cause are mentioned. So for Under Armour C, the surge is due to the Q4 earnings and revenue beating estimates. I need to make sure that all the relevant news points are consolidated. The Russian reason (Reason 6) is the most detailed and confirms the beat. The others are similar but maybe less detailed. The challenge is that the first few reasons might have slightly different EPS figures. For example, Reason 1 says earnings beat by $0.11, but Reason 6 says actual EPS was $0.09 vs. expected -$0.02, which is a $0.11 beat. So that's consistent. The $0.09 actual vs. -$0.02 expected is a $0.11 difference. So the $0.11 beat is accurate. Therefore, the main cause is the Q4 earnings and revenue beating estimates, leading to the intraday surge. I need to check if there's any conflicting information. All the news events are positive and align with the stock's upward movement. There's no negative news here. So the summary should state that Under Armour C surged 16.83% intraday after reporting Q4 earnings and revenue that beat estimates. The Russian news (Reason 6) provides the most specific numbers, so that's the key source. Now, formatting the answer according to the example. The example uses "surged 4.23% in premarket trading after announcing..." So here, it would be "surged 16.83% intraday after reporting Q4 earnings and revenue that beat estimates." Also, including the specific figures: EPS of $0.09 (vs. expected -$0.02) and revenue of $1.33B (vs. $1.31B). But maybe the summary doesn't need all the numbers.