ARI vs. LADR: por qué Apollo Commercial Finance emerge como una mejor opción de valores en el sector de los REIT y los fondos de renta variable

In the competitive landscape of real estate investment trusts (REITs) and equity trusts, investors seeking undervalued opportunities with robust fundamentals often turn to valuation metrics and earnings-driven analysis. As of December 2025, both Apollo Commercial Finance (ARI) and Ladder Capital (LADR) hold a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy), signaling positive earnings estimate revisions. However, a deeper dive into their valuation ratios, profit margins, and debt profiles reveals why ARI stands out as the superior value play for long-term investors.

Valuation Metrics: ARI's Undervaluation Outpaces LADR

Valuation metrics are critical for identifying stocks trading below their intrinsic worth. ARI's forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 9.59 is significantly lower than LADR's 12.23, indicating that ARI offers a more attractive price relative to its earnings. This gap widens when examining the price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio: ARI's PEG of 0.27 suggests it is undervalued relative to its earnings growth potential, while LADR's PEG of 7.50 implies overvaluation.

The price-to-book (P/B) ratio further reinforces this narrative. ARI's P/B of 0.76 means its market value is closer to its book value, reflecting a conservative and potentially safer investment compared to LADR's P/B of 0.97. These metrics align with Zacks' Value grade of B for ARI versus a C for LADR, underscoring ARI's stronger appeal to value investors.

Fundamentals: Profit Margins and Portfolio Expansion

ARI's financial health is bolstered by its profitability and strategic portfolio management. In Q3 2025, the company reported a net profit margin of 45.73% and a gross margin of 69.75%, demonstrating effective cost control and operational efficiency. By contrast, LADR's net margin of 34.61% and a 30.2% decline in earnings growth over the past year highlight its weaker profitability.

ARI's loan portfolio expansion also strengthens its value proposition. By year-end 2025, the company had grown its portfolio to $8.3 billion, with a weighted average unlevered all-in yield of 7.7%. This growth, coupled with distributable earnings of $42 million (exceeding analyst expectations), positions ARI to capitalize on its high-yield strategy. Meanwhile, LADR's Q3 2025 earnings missed analyst forecasts, raising concerns about its ability to sustain growth.

Debt Management and Dividend Sustainability

Debt levels are a critical consideration for leveraged REITs. ARI's debt-to-equity ratio of 405.73% may seem high, but its Debt Ratio of 0.08 in Q3 2025-a 56.41% decline from Q2-indicates proactive deleveraging. LADR, on the other hand, maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.76, but its dividend payout ratio of 146.03% raises red flags about sustainability.

ARI's dividend yield of 9.9% is also more attractive than LADR's 8.09%, with a payout ratio that appears more aligned with earnings. ARI's consistent quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share reflects confidence in its cash flow, while LADR's recent Q4 2025 dividend of $0.23 per share was declared amid earnings volatility.

Conclusion: ARI's Earnings-Driven Edge

While both ARI and LADR share a favorable Zacks Rank, ARI's superior valuation metrics, stronger profit margins, and disciplined debt management make it the clearer choice for value investors. Its ability to generate high yields through portfolio expansion and maintain a sustainable dividend further cements its position as a compelling undervalued opportunity in the REIT and equity trust sector. For investors prioritizing earnings-driven growth and conservative risk profiles, ARI emerges as the stronger contender in this comparison.