Apollo's Share Price Surges 3.36% Amid 38.83% Volume Drop, Ranking 258th in Equity Trading Activity

On September 18, 2025, Apollo Global Management (APO) traded with a volume of $430 million, marking a 38.83% decline from the previous day’s activity. The stock ranked 258th in terms of trading volume among listed equities, while its share price rose 3.36% to close the session. The movement reflects investor activity amid evolving market dynamics in the alternative asset management sector.

Recent developments impacting Apollo’s valuation include strategic shifts in its private credit offerings and adjustments to its fee structure for distressed debt funds. Analysts noted that the firm’s decision to streamline operations in its co-investment arm has drawn mixed reactions, with some investors viewing the move as a necessary step to enhance operational efficiency, while others expressed concerns over potential short-term revenue pressures.

Market participants are closely monitoring Apollo’s third-quarter earnings outlook, which hinges on the performance of its leveraged finance and real estate segments. A recent regulatory filing highlighted a 12% year-over-year increase in leveraged loan originations, though this was partially offset by a 7% decline in real estate asset valuations. These trends underscore the sector’s sensitivity to macroeconomic conditions, particularly in the context of tightening monetary policy.

To run a proper back-test I’ll need to pin down a few details that our back-testing engine requires: 1. Universe of stocks • “Top 500 by daily volume” could be calculated across one exchange (e.g., NYSE + NASDAQ) or a predefined list (e.g., S&P 500 constituents). Which universe should we use? 2. Portfolio construction details • Equal-weight each day? • Rebalance every trading day (i.e., sell yesterday’s basket and buy today’s)? 3. Benchmark (if any) for comparison. 4. Practical note on tooling Our current back-test engine evaluates one ticker at a time. To reproduce a daily-rebalanced 500-stock portfolio we can: a) Approximate with an index/ETF that tracks a similar concept (for example, an equal-weight index or a high-volume ETF), or b) Build the daily basket externally and import the resulting portfolio-level P&L series. Please let me know your preference (and any missing details), and I’ll proceed with the most accurate approach available.