Antelope Enterprise shares surge 96.46% intraday on technical rebound after prior drop and Bitcoin nearing $90k boosting crypto stocks.

think> Okay, let's tackle this query. The user wants me to transform the given text into a concise news headline following specific rules. First, I need to make sure I understand all the requirements. The company name is Antelope Enterprise. The percentage change is 96.46017699%, which I need to round to two decimal places. That would be 96.46%. The time period is intraday. The reason for the price movement has two points: a technical rebound after a 12.4% drop the previous day and Bitcoin approaching $90,000, which is boosting crypto stocks in the US. I need to include all these elements in the headline. Let me start by structuring the main part: company name, percentage, time period, and the reasons. The example provided uses "surged" for a large increase, so "surged" seems appropriate here. The first reason is the technical rebound after the previous day's decline. The second is the Bitcoin movement affecting the sector. I should combine these reasons concisely. The example also includes additional details in the second paragraph, but the user's example output only has one paragraph. Wait, looking back, the example output has two paragraphs separated by a line break. So maybe I should follow that structure, but the user's instruction says "a brief reason for the price movement," so perhaps combining both reasons into one sentence. Wait, the example output has the first paragraph as the main headline and the second as additional info. But the user's instruction says "a brief reason," so maybe I should include both reasons in the headline. Let me check the example again. The example's first sentence includes the reason (SunAtion subsidiary signed a project), and then the second paragraph gives more company info. So in this case, the two reasons (technical rebound and Bitcoin) should be included in the first part. So the structure would be: Antelope Enterprise surged 96.46% intraday, driven by a technical rebound after a 12.4% drop on December 29, 2025, and Bitcoin nearing $90,000 boosting US crypto stocks. Wait, but the user's example has the reason in the first part and then the company description in the second. The user's instruction says "a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." So perhaps the two reasons are both part of the reason. Let me make sure to include both in the first paragraph. Also, the user mentioned to write in English, so the input text is in Chinese, but the output should be in English. The company name is given in Chinese, but the example uses the English name. Wait, the input here is "Antelope Enterprise盘中 intraday大涨96.46017699%", so the company name is "Antelope Enterprise" and the rest is in Chinese. The example uses the English company name. So I should keep the company name as "Antelope Enterprise" in the output. Also, the dates: the previous day is December 29, 2025. The current date is today, which is not specified, but since the previous day was December 29, today would be December 30, 2025. But the user might not need the exact date, just the fact that it's after a 12.4% drop the previous day. Putting it all together: "Antelope Enterprise surged 96.46% intraday, driven by a technical rebound following a 12.4% decline on December 29, 2025, and Bitcoin approaching $90,000 boosting US crypto stocks." But the user's example includes the company's description in the second paragraph. Wait, the example's output has two paragraphs. The first is the headline with the reason, and the second is the company's focus. However, the user's instruction says to include a brief reason, not necessarily the company description. The example's second paragraph is part of the output, but the user's instruction says "provide a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." So maybe in this case, the two reasons are the key points, and the company's description is optional? The example includes it, but the user's instruction doesn't explicitly mention it. Hmm. Looking back at the rules: "Provide a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." The example's output includes both the reason and the company description. But the user's input here doesn't mention the company's description. The input here is about Antelope Enterprise, but there's no additional info about the company beyond the price movement. So maybe in this case, the second paragraph isn't needed. The example's second paragraph is part of the input's content, but in this case, the input doesn't have that. So I should just.