Alarum Technologies Lawsuit Deadline: A Crossroads for Investors Amid Fraud Allegations

The Alarum Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: ALAR) securities fraud lawsuit has reached a pivotal moment. With the lead plaintiff deadline fast approaching on April 15, 2025, investors who held the company’s shares between March 14, 2024, and August 26, 2024, now face a critical decision: act to preserve their rights or risk exclusion from potential recovery. This article dissects the case’s implications, the risks of inaction, and the strategic considerations for stakeholders.

The Case Unfolded: False Promises and a Sudden Crash

The lawsuit alleges Alarum executives misled investors by:
1. Inflating customer retention and growth metrics, painting a rosier picture of its business than reality.
2. Omitting material risks that undermined its ability to sustain revenue growth.
3. Overstating financial prospects, creating an artificial stock price bubble.

The truth allegedly emerged on August 26, 2024, when Alarum reported $2 million below earnings expectations, citing a sudden “customer slowdown.” The revelation triggered a catastrophic 31.3% single-day stock plunge, closing at $14.83—erasing nearly a third of its market value.

The Deadline Dilemma: Act or Abandon Rights?

Investors holding ALAR shares during the Class Period have until April 15, 2025, to seek lead plaintiff status. This designation empowers them to guide the lawsuit’s direction, though it requires legal commitment and potential scrutiny. Failure to act by this date could bar participation in any settlement or judgment, even if the case succeeds.

Key considerations:
- No automatic inclusion: Investors must formally join the class action via one of the named law firms (Rosen Law Firm, Frank R. Cruz, or Levi & Korsinsky LLP).
- Contingent fees: Legal costs are covered only if the case secures a recovery, reducing upfront risk.
- Competing law firms: Investors may choose counsel, but coordination among firms could streamline the process.

Law Firm Credentials: Choosing the Right Advocate

The firms involved boast notable track records:
- Rosen Law Firm: Recovered over $438 million for investors in 2019 and secured the largest-ever securities settlement against a Chinese firm.
- Frank R. Cruz: Specializes in shareholder rights, emphasizing the April 15 deadline.
- Levi & Korsinsky LLP: Ranked in ISS’s Top 50 securities litigation firms for seven years, with hundreds of millions in recoveries.

These credentials suggest a competitive yet experienced landscape, though investors should vet each firm’s specific strategies and communication protocols.

Why the Deadline Matters: Data-Driven Risks

The August 26 crash underscores the urgency. ALAR’s stock price dropped from a pre-announcement close of $21.60 to $14.83 in one day—a loss of $6.77 per share. If the lawsuit succeeds, plaintiffs could recover a portion of these losses. However, without timely action, investors forfeit this opportunity entirely.

Historically, securities class actions average a recovery of 10–30% of claimed losses, though outcomes vary. For example, in the 2023 Tesla securities case, plaintiffs recovered 18% of their losses after proving misstatements. Applied to ALAR’s 31.3% decline, a similar recovery could mean $1.22–$3.66 per share for affected investors—significant for large holdings.

Conclusion: Time is the Ultimate Investor

The April 15, 2025, deadline is not merely procedural—it’s a strategic inflection point. With Alarum’s stock still reeling and law firms competing for leadership, investors must act decisively. The data is clear: delayed action risks permanent loss of recovery rights, while timely participation aligns with historical patterns of partial but meaningful compensation in securities cases.

Investors are urged to consult the provided law firm contacts immediately. The stakes are high, the timeline is fixed, and the path to justice hinges on swift, informed decisions.

Final Call to Action: Submit claims via Rosen Law Firm’s portal (https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=35175), Frank R. Cruz’s website (www.frankcruzlaw.com), or Levi & Korsinsky’s submission form (https://zlk.com/pslra-1/alarum-technologies-ltd-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=142662&wire=1) before the deadline.

---

This analysis underscores the fragility of investor confidence and the legal system’s role in rectifying corporate misconduct. For those affected by Alarum’s alleged deceit, the next 12 months will determine whether justice—and compensation—remain within reach.