Agentic AI in Enterprise Software: A Tale of Misaligned R&D and Untapped ROI Potential

The 2025 enterprise software landscape is marked by a paradox: record-breaking R&D spending on agentic AI coexists with underwhelming returns for most organizations. While global GenAI spending is projected to hit $644 billion this year [6], enterprises allocating budgets to agentic AI face a stark divide between early adopters reaping transformative gains and latecomers stuck in experimental purgatory. This misalignment—where 58% of companies have deployed AI agents but only 14% report full-scale implementation [7]—reveals systemic challenges in aligning investment with value creation.
The ROI Divide: Early Adopters vs. the Rest
According to Google Cloud's 2025 ROI study, 52% of enterprises now deploy AI agents in production environments, with early adopters (those dedicating ≥50% of AI budgets to agents) achieving ROI rates 15–20% higher than peers [1]. In customer service, for instance, agentic AI reduces resolution times by 30% while boosting satisfaction scores by 22% [8]. Cybersecurity applications are equally compelling: AI agents process 10,000+ alerts daily, neutralizing threats in milliseconds and predicting attack vectors with 92% accuracy [9].
Yet, these successes mask a broader underperformance. GartnerIT-- warns that over 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by 2027 due to misapplication and cost overruns [10]. The root cause? A mismatch between R&D priorities and business outcomes. While 58% of companies reallocated budgets to AI in 2025 [11], many are still investing in “AI for AI's sake,” prioritizing technical novelty over measurable impact.
Misallocation: Where the Money Goes vs. Where It Should
The BCG IT Spending Pulse survey reveals a critical disconnect: enterprises allocate 28% of AI R&D budgets to customer service (a high-ROI use case) but only 18% to legacy infrastructure modernization—a foundational requirement for agentic AI [12]. Meanwhile, speculative tools like AI-driven content generation receive 17% of budgets despite delivering just 3% ROI [13]. This imbalance is exacerbated by organizational inertia: 70% of companies still rely on legacy KPIs to evaluate AI projects, optimizing for outdated metrics like “automation of repetitive tasks” rather than strategic outcomes like customer retention or fraud prevention [14].
Cybersecurity offers a telling case study. While 46% of AI agent deployments target security operations [15], only 36% of enterprises invest in scalable data pipelines to train these agents on unstructured data (e.g., voice logs, emails) [16]. The result? Over-reliance on narrow-use-case models that fail to adapt to evolving threats.
The Path to Alignment: Governance, Governance, Governance
Closing the ROI gap requires a three-pronged approach:
1. Strategic Reallocation: Shift budgets toward use cases with proven ROI, such as customer service automation (43% ROI) and cybersecurity (40% ROI) [1].
2. Process Redesign: Modernize workflows to integrate AI agents into core operations, rather than treating them as isolated tools [17].
3. Governance Over Hype: Implement real-time explainability, adaptive security, and cross-functional oversight to mitigate risks like agentic errors and data silos [18].
For example, Bain & Company highlights how AI leaders achieve 10–25% EBITDA gains by embedding agents into end-to-end workflows [19]. These organizations prioritize “agentic constellations”—networks of specialized agents collaborating across departments—over single-function tools.
Conclusion: The $11.5 Billion Question
Enterprise R&D spending on agentic AI is set to rise 5.7% in 2025, outpacing overall IT budget growth of 1.8% [20]. Yet, with 62% of companies expecting ≥100% ROI on agentic AI investments [21], the stakes for strategic alignment have never been higher. The path forward lies not in chasing technical novelty but in redefining success: aligning AI systems with business outcomes, not just technical benchmarks. As one executive put it, “The future belongs to enterprises that treat agentic AI as a business transformation engine, not a cost center.”

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios