2Z -4427.09% in 1 Year Amid Market Pressure and Liquidity Challenges

On OCT 8 2025, 2Z dropped by 264.91% within 24 hours to reach $0.00030685, 2Z dropped by 3023.44% within 7 days, dropped by 4427.09% within 1 month, and dropped by 4427.09% within 1 year.

The sharp decline in 2Z over the past year has intensified scrutiny among market participants, particularly given the token’s inability to regain traction despite periodic short-term rebounds. Analysts have noted that the sustained downward momentum reflects underlying structural issues, including limited use cases, reduced liquidity, and lack of strategic development updates. Market observers have highlighted that the token’s trajectory has been further exacerbated by broader macroeconomic factors that have weakened speculative investor sentiment.

Technical indicators suggest that 2Z is trading in a deeply bearish phase, with key support levels failing to hold. The 200-day exponential moving average (EMA) continues to trend downward, indicating a prolonged period of bearish dominance. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has remained well below 30 for extended periods, signaling oversold conditions without any meaningful follow-through in buying interest. Intraday traders have reported minimal price discovery, as the asset lacks the volume necessary to generate conviction in either direction.

The absence of institutional support and the shrinking number of active wallets further complicate the asset's recovery. While some retail investors remain optimistic about potential bottoming patterns, the broader market’s apathy has contributed to the token’s continued depreciation. Analysts project that without a material shift in fundamentals, the asset is likely to continue underperforming compared to broader market indices.

The technical indicators used in evaluating 2Z’s price action include the 200-day EMA and RSI. These tools are commonly applied in assessing long-term price trends and momentum. The backtesting strategy involves evaluating how a long or short position would have performed over the past 12 months, with the aim of identifying whether a predefined set of entry and exit rules would have yielded positive returns. The strategy hinges on the assumption that 2Z would have entered a sell-off phase when the RSI crossed below 30 and remained under this threshold for a minimum of three consecutive days, with a stop-loss placed at the 200-day EMA. The hypothesis is that a mechanical trading system based on these rules could have minimized losses or identified early exit points during the prolonged downtrend.