why is ATOM "Ample Liquidity"

The term "Ample Liquidity" for ATOM (Atomera) is not supported by available evidence. In fact, the term is contradicted by existing information about ATOM's liquidity challenges and its risk of poor performance.

1. Liquidity Challenges: ATOM faces liquidity challenges due to its bonded ratios and the need for open market liquidity to defend against 51% attacks. The bonded ratios, while providing some security, are not sufficient on their own. Enhancing liquidity through strategies like lending ATOM to DeFi protocols and focusing on seamless interactions with stablecoins is crucial for improving liquidity.
2. Insider Sentiment: The CEO and President of Atomera have sold a significant number of shares, which could be indicative of a lack of confidence in the company's short-term prospects. Insider selling can be a signal to investors about the potential risks associated with an asset.
3. Financial Performance: Atomera has a negative Return on Total Assets (TTM) of -71.7%, which is significantly worse than the Information Technology sector median of 1.98%. This financial performance, coupled with a Sell rating from the Quant rating system, suggests that ATOM is at high risk of underperformance.
4. Market Sentiment: The lack of market sentiment supporting the notion of "Ample Liquidity" for ATOM is evident. The company's financials and insider actions indicate a challenging environment for liquidity, contrasting with the idea of ample liquidity.

In conclusion, the concept of "Ample Liquidity" for ATOM does not align with the current conditions and indicators. The challenges highlighted by the liquidity needs, insider actions, financial performance, and market sentiment suggest a more precarious liquidity situation than what the term "Ample Liquidity" implies.