

Fidelity's representation of a covered call's maximum loss as "unlimited" is a theoretical construct that highlights the risk of a covered call strategy when the underlying stock's price drops significantly. This risk arises from the fact that the call option seller (also known as the writer) is obligated to sell the underlying stock at the strike price to the call option buyer if the contract is exercised. If the stock's price falls below the strike price, the call option will expire worthless, and the call seller will have no recourse to sell the stock at a higher price.
The concern is that if the stock's price declines to zero or near zero, the call seller would still have to fulfill the obligation to sell the stock at the strike price, potentially resulting in an unlimited loss. This is because the call seller's potential loss is not limited to the premium received for the call option; it is also subject to the underlying stock's price risk.
In other words, if the stock's price falls below the strike price and stays there, the call seller will have to sell the stock at the strike price, which could result in a loss equal to the difference between the strike price and the stock's price, plus any additional costs or fees. This is why Fidelity and other financial institutions caution investors about the risks associated with covered calls, especially when the underlying stock is not expected to decline significantly.
To mitigate this risk, investors often use covered calls in conjunction with a long position in the underlying stock, hoping to limit the downside risk by owning the stock and collecting the premium from the call option. However, this strategy does not eliminate risk entirely, as the call option's intrinsic value (the difference between the stock's price and the strike price) can still turn negative if the stock's price falls below the strike price.
